Message from discussion
Presenting new license: KPL
Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:39:35 -0600
Return-Path: <lvi...@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org
Delivered-To: governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org
Received-SPF: none (mozilla.com: No applicable sender policy available)
receiver=notorious.mozilla.org; identity=mailfrom;
envelope-from="lvi...@mozilla.com"; helo=mail.mozilla.com;
client-ip=10.2.72.14
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:39:29 -0800
From: Luis Villa <lvi...@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: Presenting new license: KPL
References: <mailman.394.1289094485.12650.governance-mpl-update@lists.mozilla.org>
<4CD82506.6040105@mozilla.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CD82506.6040105@mozilla.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org
X-BeenThere: governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of the MPL update process."
<governance-mpl-update.lists.mozilla.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.mozilla.org/options/governance-mpl-update>,
<mailto:governance-mpl-update-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org>
List-Help: <mailto:governance-mpl-update-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance-mpl-update>,
<mailto:governance-mpl-update-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=subscribe>
Approved: governance-mpl-upd...@lists.mozilla.org
Newsgroups: mozilla.governance.mpl-update
Message-ID: <mailman.487.1289237974.12650.governance-mpl-update@lists.mozilla.org>
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.245.208.166
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-7ZfzBLT2wLdQedGodpAIKYWkyjYZTbAfSiSj4iXEYTpfWg8qpi+2U5BfsqN8N7dk3RCbU+5vP+Qi+DN!yfzgp3nzfaxQjlF3Gn/DMxHd3S6DjxqhZmHTiMZLub1LIFZhHPP0mN66L6MIEO0gPnegv4dFvO3m!nXW5cme8g+bQMl3oxJ+DYNNZCawxXOpzEKHMaqrGxG0cyQ==
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3950
On 11/8/10 8:27 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 06/11/10 19:19, Ben Bucksch wrote:
>> I'd like to present a new license. It's the "Kermit Public License". The
>> terms are identical with the MPL 1.1, the only difference being that
>> only Kermit can update the license. That's already the definition of the
>> license.
>
> Kermit the Frog?
>
>> I have used that in some source code in the past. I'd like mozilla.org
>> to approve this as license allowed to Mozilla source code.
>
> Let's say we say No. What is your response?
>
> (But I agree with Mike - you seem very much to be trolling. Which is not
> in character for you. If you have a point, come out and make it.)
Mike was also right that this is off-topic for this list. If you have
specific objections to the license which might make it unsuitable for
use by any project (including, but not limited to, Mozilla) then I'd
love to hear about them here, so that we can try to address them before
we release the license. But discussions of what licenses Mozilla will
use, how Mozilla should pick a license, etc., are mostly off-topic here;
governance@ will have a thorough discussion of the Mozilla project's
policy when the time is right.
Luis
--
Luis Villa, Mozilla Legal
work email: lvi...@mozilla.com (preferred)
work phone: 650-903-0800 x327
personal: http://tieguy.org/about/