Re: Comments on feedback management of hacks.mozilla.org

[Christopher Blizzard]

On 1/15/2011 8:36 PM, Jim Wilt wrote:
> Your integrity is only going to be as good as you can accept criticism that is in the light of fairness. As the board that manages this medium of communication, I hope that you find it in your graces to not only deal with the issues raised, but to also communicate back to your constituents that promote Firefox and those that challenge it in a fair and consistent manner that shows greater maturity.
>
> It's your ball, after all, so while you choose who you choose to share it, your choices will reveal the nature of who you really are.

Odds are it's just in the moderation queue. We don't aggressively
filter criticism.

--Chris

[Jim Wilt]

Thanks guys - I believe moderation is both necessary and beneficial if you consider that you are guaranteed that your comment is reviewed by at least one person who matters/is empowered :-)

From: Stormy Peters [mailto:spe...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:29 PM
To: Christopher Blizzard
Cc: Jim Wilt; evang...@lists.mozilla.org; Gen Kanai; Paul Rouget; Stormy Peters
Subject: Re: Comments on feedback management of hacks.mozilla.org

Hi Jim,

It was just in the moderation queue. It looks like one of my colleagues got to it before me and it's already been approved. (And as much as we'd like to not moderate comments at all, that's not possible given the amount of spam blogs get ...)

Thanks for taking the time to leave your comments.

Stormy

[Christopher Blizzard]

On 1/18/2011 12:32 PM, Jim Wilt wrote:
>
> Thanks guys -- I believe moderation is both /necessary/ and
> /beneficial/ if you consider that you are guaranteed that your comment

> is reviewed by at least one person who matters/is empowered :-)
>

Just to be clear, when I moderate I will delete stuff that's obvious
trolling or totally useless or obscene. But your comments aren't even
close to that. Thanks for contacting us. :)

--Chris