Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion XForms extension for Firefox version 0.8.6 is available
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Aaron Reed  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2008, 5:27 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.tech.xforms
From: Aaron Reed <aar...@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:27:25 -0500
Local: Tues, Oct 7 2008 5:27 pm
Subject: Re: XForms extension for Firefox version 0.8.6 is available
Hey Philipp,

You'd be better off talking to Alex Surkov.  He did that work.  I don't
think that the patch was written in order to have any performance
improvements, though we knew that one of the nice results of the patch
would be improved performance in some scenarios.

--Aaron

Philipp Wagner wrote:
> Aaron Reed wrote:
>> We are happy to announce that the XForms extension for Firefox version
>> 0.8.6 for FF2 is available for download from http://addons.mozilla.org.
>>  Please note, we are still waiting for approval for 0.8.6 for FF3 from
>> addons.

> As a side note, the Firefox 3 Linux version contains binary parts for
> x86 and x86_64, so all Linux users who use their distribution's default
> Firefox installation on 64bit machines should be able to use the
> addons.mozilla.org version without problems.

> Also note that dropdown lists on Linux will have two arrows (bug
> #457075). The patch provided in the bug is only a kind of a workaround,
> the "solution" would be to convert the select1 into "native widgets"
> like this has been done for other elements (but there seems now to be
> some discussion about whether this was the right thing to do
> [performance regressions on large data sets due to slow mutation
> handlers AFAIK], so no idea how this will end up).

> Aaron, I could try to put some time into that. If you have a free
> minute, could you give a quick summary on how it was before you switched
> to the "native widget approach", what you tried to solve with that and
> am I right with the performance problems associated with that? I read
> through some of the bug reports, but the actual intention behind the
> changes didn't become completely clear to me.

> Philipp


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google