Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
WIN95 target on XP and Vista differ?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Jon Leighton
Mar 19, 2009, 11:37:43 AM3/19/09
to
When I build NSPR on XP with the --enable-win32-target=WIN95 option, the
build uses pr/include/md/_win95.h, but if I build on Vista with the same
option, the build uses pr/include/md/_winnt.h. Is this the correct
behavior? If so, can anyone help me understand why? Thanks very much.
build uses pr/include/md/_win95.h, but if I build on Vista with the same
option, the build uses pr/include/md/_winnt.h. Is this the correct
behavior? If so, can anyone help me understand why? Thanks very much.
- Jon Leighton
Wan-Teh Chang
Mar 19, 2009, 12:02:23 PM3/19/09
to Jon Leighton, dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
The correct behavior is to use _win95.h if the --enable-win32-target=WIN95
option is specified. If you didn't type the option incorrectly on Vista, this
is a bug in NSPR's build system.
Wan-Teh
Jon Leighton
Mar 19, 2009, 1:16:03 PM3/19/09
to
It turns out that I only see this problem with the current CVS version
of NSPR. Version 4.7.3 doesn't have this problem.
- Jon Leighton
Wan-Teh Chang
Mar 20, 2009, 12:47:05 AM3/20/09
to Jon Leighton, dev-te...@lists.mozilla.org
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jon Leighton <leig...@cis.udel.edu> wrote:
>
> It turns out that I only see this problem with the current CVS version of
> NSPR. Version 4.7.3 doesn't have this problem.
>
> It turns out that I only see this problem with the current CVS version of
> NSPR. Version 4.7.3 doesn't have this problem.
I reproduced this bug. It is a regression introduced by the new
--enable-symbian-target option
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442706).
I just checked in a fix. Thanks a lot. I'm glad you found the bug
quickly.
Wan-Teh
0 new messages