Andrew Schultz pisze:
> Gervase Markham wrote:A simpler solution, I think, would be to drop "Firefox/x.x.x.x" from the
>> So perhaps the right thing to do is to remove the Firefox name from
>> the UA string? If Firefox itself did it, the web would need to pay
> This seems like a great idea to me. The only good reason I can see to
UA string, but leave the product name in place for other apps (Camino,
SeaMonkey, Thunderbird). Basically, let's re-use the late Mozilla
Suite's UA string for Firefox.
So, imagine we had implemented this solution in 1.8. Firefox 126.96.36.199
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; pl; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/2007051502
but Camino's UA string wouldn't need any changes:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; pl; rv:184.108.40.206)
This way, stats companies can still easily differentiate between
In a sense, this is what Camino developers wanted - full Firefox UA
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.