On 02/01/2012 03:00 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
> P.S. -- Yeah yeah, I know, archer. I'm not entirely certain if my
> system's debugger's new enough to use it, it apparently requires
> ongoing work to keep it working, and I'm still faintly old-school
> about this. :-)
I'll be the first to agree that the Archer support is way more brittle
than I'd like it to be, even granted how, um, "dynamic" our data
representations have been in the last few years.
I think the solution is to put a primitive layer of interpretation in
C++, and test it from 'make check', so that people know to update it
when they change things.
However, Mozilla-archer does run on stock GDB nowadays.