Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.dev.security
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Content Security Policy Spec questions and feedback
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bil Corry  
View profile  
 More options Jul 8 2009, 1:22 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.security
From: Bil Corry <b...@corry.biz>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:22:55 -0500
Local: Wed, Jul 8 2009 1:22 pm
Subject: Re: Content Security Policy Spec questions and feedback
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Gervase Markham wrote on 7/8/2009 11:25 AM:

> On 07/07/09 19:18, Sid Stamm wrote:
>> I personally want to eradicate the META tag
>> (http://blog.sidstamm.com/2009/06/csp-with-or-without-meta.html). This
>> should be discussed more in depth to decide if we should remove META
>> support, if we should support multiple HTTP headers, etc.

> My comment:

> Why not allow multiple headers, and keep the intersection algorithm?

> This way, the hosting company has to provide a special interface for
> editing the header rather than the customer just being able to type it
> into the page, but it still allows it to make non-negotiable
> restrictions. They just serve their restrictions in the first header,
> and make sure the customer-provided header comes afterwards.

If the hosting company is providing an interface to add one or more additional CSP headers, then wouldn't it be just as easy for them to provide an interface that constructs a single header?

- Bil


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google