Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Mozilla 2 repository migration dirlist
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
brendan@mozilla.org  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 2007, 1:24 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
From: "bren...@mozilla.org" <bren...@mozilla.org>
Date: 28 Mar 2007 10:24:53 -0700
Local: Wed, Mar 28 2007 1:24 pm
Subject: Re: Mozilla 2 repository migration dirlist
On Mar 28, 9:51 am, Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org> wrote:

> Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> > This is a natural continuation of the plans to separate the "core" from the
> > apps built on top of it. Firefox has a special place here because it is the
> > primary app used to test the core, and its primary driver.

> > All of our apps are going to be built on the xulrunner core in the moz2
> > timeframe, and the repository structure is just a natural extension of that
> > architecture.

> If the idea is that every XULRunner app apart from Firefox is built by
> pulling from 2 (or more) repositories - the core one and the
> app-specific one - and combining the result, why not apply the same
> logic to Firefox?

Because that's a lot of work we don't need to do right now, and can't
afford to do right now. Mozilla 2 is already under way and it needs a
repository. We need working Firefox and XULRunner built on it.

> It would mean that whatever magic is necessary to
> perform such a combination is guaranteed to keep working. And it would
> guarantee a clean interface between what was platform and what was not.

There's no point in perfecting the separation of any given modules
before we start the Mozilla 2 repository. Nor must we do all that work
in the 1.9 time frame -- most of it fits in Mozilla 2 much better. We
are not going to spend all our time first cleaning up widget or gfx,
or removing nss and nsprpub to their own repos, etc. etc. Shaver keeps
attributing Voltaire's "best is the enemy of the good" to me, and what
did Voltaire know? But it fits here.

/be


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.