> > See the dicussion here:

> > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478665>

> > ...but please don't add to it. This venue is better for threaded
> > discussion.

> > Here's a summary by Sam Ruby:

> > "Here's my current understanding: HTML4 is vague and defines a set of
> > features.
> > Rob's draft adds well defined error handling and a very select few
> > features.
> > Ian's draft adds (as compared to HTML4) well defined error handling, a
> > rendering section, and quite a bit more features.  To the point that I
> > understand both, at the moment Rob's draft appears to be consistent
> > with the
> > direction that Ian's draft is pursuing, largely by virtue of being a
> > derived
> > work and containing approximately 60 to 65% of the original text
> > verbatim.

> > Rob's work differs substantially from the work of Mike, DanC and
> > Lachlan."

> > At this point, it's just an HTML file I produced. I haven't proposed
> > it to the WG or anything like that. I want to know what the Mozilla
> > community thinks. However, I'm not asking for requirements of the form
> > "before you do X, you have to do Y", since those are often used as a
> > way of directing people to work on things they're not interested in.

> For the record, I think it's harmless to good, as long as it doesn't
> become HTML5 thus leading to headlines like "Video removed from HTML5"
> (and similar for other features), which would hurt our work in those areas.