Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.dev.platform
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion An alternate take on HTML5
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sayrer  
View profile  
 More options Feb 18 2009, 8:13 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
From: sayrer <say...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:13:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 18 2009 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: An alternate take on HTML5
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Feb 18, 8:06 pm, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:

> > I recognize you might not agree, and I expect "getting consensus" is
> > more important to me than to you.

> But you don't have consensus on not having the rendering section...

Well, it's clear that I don't have unanimity.

> I guess I don't really see the point of doing something quickly if it
> leaves things underdefined -- underdefined (as opposed to omitted
> entirely) seems far worse than slow.

If they are underdefined now, it doesn't make things worse. imho.

- Rob


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google