The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:10:52 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 19 2009 9:10 am
Subject: Re: An alternate take on HTML5
Henri Sivonen wrote: Since they're implementing with vendor prefixes, this might well not be > But the CSS WG is free to change only those aspects of CSS3 that > implementations have not yet converged on. the case, actually... until CR, of course. > It seems to me that if the CSS WG were to change a That depends on how that part interacted with other parts, in my opinion. > part of CSS that has been interoperably implemented, it would be going > astray. > Splitting stuff out of HTML5 in order to make it get to REC fast would This might not inherently be a problem. > mean that the part that got to REC would already be obsolete in the > sense that it wouldn't accurately capture the new action in the > development of the platform even if it were accurate for the older parts. > If the purpose is to communicate to authors, why does the document at Communicating to UA authors is not a bad thing either. It's good to > http://people.mozilla.com/~sayrer/2009/02/15/html5.html > include the HTML5 parsing algorithm? Shouldn't authors be shown > something like the "Writing" section instead? know when the spec editor feels they're done with gratuitous changes and are waiting on impl feedback. Going to CR announces this, but since HTML5 isn't planning to do this for a while... -Boris You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||