Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
From: rubys <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Feb 19 2009 8:30 am
Subject: Re: An alternate take on HTML5
On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, rubys wrote: You've made amazing progress to date, and I very much want you to > > On Feb 18, 8:06 pm, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > I entirely agree with this. You'll note that HTML5 has been exactly on > > Question: what is the published timetable for test cases being complete? > The URI I cited earlier in this thread, namely the aforementioned > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/TIMETABLE > (It has to, since without a complete test suite the spec can't exit CR.) continue. However from my perspective you have done so by cutting a number of big corners: including the need to establish and maintain consensus, and the need to create test suites up front. Frankly, the first corner I mentioned will bite you in the ass when we Rob's bar which I will characterize as "no worse than HTML4 and - Sam Ruby You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||