Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
From: Simon Paquet <web...@babylonsounds.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:47:27 +0200
Local: Wed, Mar 28 2007 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: Mozilla 2 repository migration dirlist
bren...@mozilla.org wrote on 28. Mar 2007:
>> I just wish that they would openly say so, and not try to tell There's a difference between caring about the platform all of the >> people otherwise or blind people's eyes with stuff like the >> manifesto, which MoCo obviously has no intention to adhere to. > Careful with the accusations of dishonesty or at least hypocrisy. > There's strong feeling here, but not much that's true. If we didn't time (and thereby adhering to the manifesto) or doing so only some of the time, which is my impression. Just to be clear, I'm *not* calling you or other people from MoCo The first one is fine, the second one is not. This feels more and > There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Firefox pays bills Yes. And as a Firefox user/QA supporter from the m/b days I really appreciate that and all the good it has brought to the project. > Never mind that we have XUL App #2 (Thunderbird) and it faces What I really don't understand (maybe my lack of knowledge of VCSs > other challenges because *it's not the browser*. I'm not saying a > thick mail client should not be supported by the platform. I am > saying it's bound to place or show, not win. That means it will > not *necessarily* be included in the new repository. besides CVS is the reason) is, why the new repository must be restricted to the core code and Firefox? What do we lose if we add the other stuff like mail, mailnews, calendar, suite? > Joost, Songbird, and Flock are not so hosted. Should they be, or Don't you think that there is a huge difference between official > our manifesto talk is all lies? mozilla.org projects sustained by a real community and products outside of mozilla.org, which are funded with VC money. > But we're not going to make everyone happy. We're going to shrink How will a restricted repository speed things up. You can already > and speed up our codebase restrict your cvs pull to directories which are needed by Firefox and not pull the stuff in mail, mailnews, calendar or suite. Is that not possible in Mercurial? -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||