Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.dev.planning
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Firefox 3.1: Beta 3 proposal
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
caturn88  
View profile  
 More options Nov 27 2008, 10:15 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: caturn88 <lovel...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 27 2008 10:15 pm
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.1: Beta 3 proposal
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I don't know if I should be posting here about such a trivial thing
but I would like to speak up for the Mac OS X users who would like to
see more of the swish graphics used in Safari in FF, like search,
that's built into cocoa and you can use it, I'm sure, I've seem
Smultron use it. And dragging tabs is so much prettier too.

Thanks.

On Nov 27, 10:04 pm, Mike Beltzner <beltz...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 27-Nov-08, at 4:58 PM, Mook wrote:

> > Mike Beltzner wrote:
> >> On 26-Nov-08, at 11:27 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> >> Without disagreeing that there's a lot to talk about here, in this  
> >> case I was speaking more in terms of Firefox-as-platform (for add-
> >> on developers) than Gecko-as-platform (which is I think more  
> >> relevant to the point you're making.)

> > That's the same platform.  XULRunner doesn't get its own...  
> > anything, pretty much.  If, hypothetically, worker threads gets  
> > dropped in Firefox 3.1, it won't ever show up in XULRunner 1.9.1.  
> > Please either stop separating the two in your mind, or actually  
> > separate them and have people actually driving XULRunner by itself?

> They're not fully separate in my head, no. The point I was making was  
> specifically about the add-on community, which is a very different  
> subset than the application-built-on-Gecko community.

> People are welcome to drive XULRunner by itself. I'm pretty sure some  
> people are.

> cheers,
> mike


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google