Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Firefox 2 End Of Life
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike Beltzner  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29 2008, 11:28 am
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: Mike Beltzner <beltz...@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:28:19 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 29 2008 11:28 am
Subject: Re: Firefox 2 End Of Life
On 29-Oct-08, at 9:26 AM, Simon Paquet wrote:

> Please see the discussion around John O'Duinn's post "Firefox2
> desupport now only 3 months away" back in September here in this
> newsgroup.

> My biggest concern is that no other major mozilla.org Gecko consumer
> (Thunderbird, Sunbird, SeaMonkey, Camino) has yet released a major
> release based on Mozilla 1.9 code.

As with that previous discussion, right now our focus is understanding  
the impact on Firefox. Your points are quite valid, though, as Firefox  
is often tied to Gecko, and we should be careful when examining what  
actions we should take once Firefox 2 reaches end of life to ensure  
that we don't starve consumers still relying on Gecko 1.8.1.

> While one could argue that SeaMonkey, Sunbird and Camino are
> niche-products and one mustn't wait for them to update, I'm
> especially concerned about Thunderbird here.

> Based on the current TB3 release planning, TB3 will be released 3-4
> months after the Gecko 1.8 EOL, when TB2 is still the stable release.

Do we have similar targets for Seamonkey, Camino, Sunbird,  
InstantBird, Miro, etc?

> Comments from my Chris Cooper and Mike Connor in the discussion
> mentioned above removed my concerns at the time, but I can't find
> anything in your post that addresses this.

Indeed - I should have mentioned that we'd registered the impact of  
decommissioning Gecko 1.8.1 infrastructure (in terms of test machines  
and emphasis on security issues) on other consumers. As Coop and  
mconnor stated, historically we've continued to support the platform  
even after the product has reached end of life (see Gecko 1.8) - it's  
just a matter of understanding what parts of the infrastructure will  
no longer be needed once Firefox 2 is out of the picture.

cheers,
mike


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.