Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Any plans for a Mozilla-based OS?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
emery.denuc...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 16 2007, 7:58 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: emery.denuc...@gmail.com
Date: 16 Mar 2007 16:58:48 -0700
Local: Fri, Mar 16 2007 7:58 pm
Subject: Re: Any plans for a Mozilla-based OS?
On Mar 16, 11:11 am, "Mike Beltzner" <beltz...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I'm sure that others have opinions here, but to my mind the browser *is* an OS, with the application layer being AJAX patterned apps which can be run in online and offline state. So we're kind of already there.

> All we need to do is tune the UI a little, but you can see bookmarks <-> shortcuts, history/cache/storage <-> file system, extensions <-> plugins/system helpers.

> "The network is the computer," indeed!

> cheers,
> mike

It's not an OS, but it is indeed a platform. Really it's middle-ware
that is ported to a number of OS's. On each OS it is implemented
differently, on top of or along side an existing native GUI, because
there isn't a Mozilla desktop. The thing is that XUL beats the socks
off of any other GUI (IMO), and it seems unfair for it not to have a
dedicated OS where it is the native GUI instead of just mimicking the
look n' feels of all these others. It wouldn't be a monumental task to
create a desktop with XUL. It would first be a matter of tying in the
things that are now currently borrowed from the native API, like find
file dialogs. Then we'd need to make a Mozilla-based graphical shell.
Doing what Gnome and KDE have done should not take nearly as much
effort because most of the work is already done. XUL is already an
incredibly powerful widget toolkit with all the works (widgets,
locales, skinning, etc...) built into it already.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.