The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: Schrep <mtsch...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:33:39 -0700
Local: Sun, Jul 8 2007 2:33 pm
Subject: Re: Milestone Scheduling
> 1) Where do wanted-1.9 bugs fit into this setup? Especially
regressions > since 1.8? That's correct. But more generally regressions fixes since 1.8 are > OK to land before M7, need approval after M7 like everything else. The > notation is meaningless in terms of release scheduling, and only there > to indicate to people who want something to do what to work on (outside > the blockers). encouraged and welcomed throughout the schedule. > 2) Where do long-standing patches that have been waiting on reviews Correct > for months that are neither blocking1.9 nor marked wanted-1.9 fit in > at this point? > 2) As #1, unless they're feature additions. > 3) Does "platform features" (the things that should no longer be worked Correct. We are trying to start reducing the total amount of code > on) include platform bug and regression fixes that are not blockers, > or only new functionality? > 3) New functionality. churn by closing the gate to new stuff and focusing on regression fixes. > 4) How does one request approval for patches? Correct. > 4) We'll add a flag before M7 ships. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||