The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: Asa Dotzler <a...@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:26:27 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 5 2010 3:26 pm
Subject: Re: Dropping Mac OS X 10.4 support in Gecko 1.9.3
On 2/5/2010 8:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
> And I am not the only one. I just happen to be the only one to voice an no the only one. There are curerntly approximately 1.5 million people using Firefox on 10.4 and we're fully aware of that. > opinion. Most just take what they are given and stew in the background. Does this suggestion come with a donation for doubling of full-time > Silly me I don't. So in the end my opinion doesn't count for anything. > You' do what you do. Do what a lot of shareware do, use a two track > method. designate one for older versions and one for newer versions. development resources, QA and testing, build and release infrastructure, and user support for this second track that would cover a shrinking minority of Firefox on Mac users? > You can create a one with all the fancy new stuff. Then one for us poor If you cannot afford to "drop 3k at the drop of a hat" perhaps you can > people that can drop 3k at the drop of the hat and have to hang on to > older equipment out of necessity. afford to save up over the next year or so while this transition happens so you can by a newer Mac (Apple has refurbished iMacs running Snow Leopard for ~USD850 http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac In a year, I'll bet you could find one for half that price.) That being said, I suspect that any sane outcome of this discussion will - A You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||