Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion What's next after Firefox 3 and Gecko 1.9?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John J Barton  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2008, 9:18 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: John J Barton <johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:18:04 -0700
Local: Mon, May 19 2008 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: What's next after Firefox 3 and Gecko 1.9?

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I think we gained very little as far as add-on compatibility goes by
> freezing as many APIs as we did. Only binary extensions have anything to
> gain by the level of freezing that we used, script-only extensions will
> not be affected.

Mozilla seems to have several different kinds of APIs so I'm not clear
on what freezing/compatibility issues are being discussed.  But late in
FF3, the effective API for extensions changed because of changes in
security model. At least for Firebug this had far more impact than any
reworking of APIs I can imagine.  Similarly the new https requirement on
extensions.  So if some good comes from evolving the APIs, its seems
like it would not be significant additional cost for extensions.

John.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.