The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: John J Barton <johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:18:04 -0700
Local: Mon, May 19 2008 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: What's next after Firefox 3 and Gecko 1.9?
Jonas Sicking wrote: Mozilla seems to have several different kinds of APIs so I'm not clear > I think we gained very little as far as add-on compatibility goes by > freezing as many APIs as we did. Only binary extensions have anything to > gain by the level of freezing that we used, script-only extensions will > not be affected. on what freezing/compatibility issues are being discussed. But late in FF3, the effective API for extensions changed because of changes in security model. At least for Firebug this had far more impact than any reworking of APIs I can imagine. Similarly the new https requirement on extensions. So if some good comes from evolving the APIs, its seems like it would not be significant additional cost for extensions. John. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||