Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.dev.planning
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Firefox 3.1 status update
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Axel Hecht  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 9:13 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: Axel Hecht <l...@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:13:16 +0100
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 9:13 pm
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.1 status update
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
To add here, I think it's common understanding that we're keeping the
tree as string frozen as planned. Not sure if that's impacting the
features you're thinking about.

Axel

On 26.02.2009 2:36 Uhr, Mike Beltzner wrote:

> We are going to be extremely conservative here, using the criteria that we
> use for non-blocker approvals. To get in, a feature will need to be:

>   - complete: no follow up fixes or initial implimentations that commit us to
> extending the schedule further
>   - proven: patches with tests, security reviews and performance impact
> analysis, baked on trunk for a good amount of time
>   - valuable: we need to understand the benefit of taking the change, and why
> it's needed for 3.1 instead of later
>   - removable: backout-ready, if anything goes wrong

> There are certain things which are tempting targets of opportunity, and I'm
> happy to talk about them when people are done their work on the 120 blockers
> that remain, but we should not consider this as a re-opening for new
> features.

> At least, as I understand things at this time :)

> cheers,
> mike

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dev-planning-bounces+beltzner=mozilla....@lists.mozilla.org
> <dev-planning-bounces+beltzner=mozilla....@lists.mozilla.org>
> To: dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org<dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org>
> Sent: Wed Feb 25 17:05:57 2009
> Subject: Re: Firefox 3.1 status update

> Any chance of accepting new features that were originally intended for
> 1.9.2 given the addition of a 4th beta?
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google