Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion What's next after Firefox 3 and Gecko 1.9?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Benjamin Smedberg  
View profile  
 More options May 20 2008, 4:48 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: Benjamin Smedberg <benja...@smedbergs.us>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:48:28 -0400
Local: Tues, May 20 2008 4:48 pm
Subject: Re: What's next after Firefox 3 and Gecko 1.9?

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Mike Shaver wrote:
>> We should _break_ as few APIs as possible, but no fewer.  Additive
>> changes to unfrozen APIs should be looked at with a kind eye

> Does that mean no revving the iid for such changes (just adds a method
> to the end of the vtable) on the branch?  Otherwise we get binary
> extension issues no matter what, right?

I don't think we're optimizing for binary extensions, but rather for JS
usage: the fewer JS extensions we break in this short cycle, the better off
we are (of course, the same rule applies in general!)

--BDS


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.