Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion removing OJI, LiveConnect, and the XPCOM plugin API in Gecko 1.9.2
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
josh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 22, 9:31 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
From: josh...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: removing OJI, LiveConnect, and the XPCOM plugin API in Gecko 1.9.2
On Mar 22, 5:18 pm, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:

> josh...@gmail.com wrote:
> > To put this change in perspective in terms of a timeline, the earliest
> > a browser with those changes would ship would be approximately Q2
> > 2010.

> Is that seriously how late the release after 1.9.1 is planned for?
> That's rather sad-making.  I was hoping we'd do a Gecko release before
> that.  :(  Was there a discussion I missed somewhere?

This is an estimate of mine, I haven't heard any formal plans. Planned
is < actual in almost every case anyway, and Q2 2010 is less than 1
year after 1.9.1. I'd be extremely surprised if we saw a 1.9.2 release
before March of 2010.

> > The argument against committing now is that we'll go for a period of
> > time on the trunk without a Java plugin on Mac OS X and without Real
> > player on all platforms. However, we are not losing regression
> > coverage because both plugins are being replaced entirely and users
> > that actually need those capabilities can use Firefox 3.5.

> We might be using trunk testing coverage in general, though, if people
> can't use it because sites they rely on don't work without Java....  Do
> we have any data on this?

I think the number of Mac OS X trunk nightly users that rely on Java
so much that they can't occasionally use Firefox 3.5 for a bit is very
small. I'm not worried about their impact on overall nightly testing
coverage. I have no idea where we'd get data on that.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google