> That was a fun night!   I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of memory
> before...

> Below is my understanding of our current status.  I'd like to try and
> wrap this up today if we can.  Can I get everyones help with the following?

> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here
> b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to
> coordinate with others to land in free window today.  BKap I think you
> are up first...
> c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf
> regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest.  Options for each of these:
>    i) hold a7 and get them in
>    ii) move them to 1.9.1
>    iii) let them slip into a8

> Best,

> Schrep

> Landed:

> 1) URLClassifier
> 2) doc.all changes
> 3) oncopy/onpaste
> 4) SVG lighting filters
> 5) Full zoom (4821)
> 6) CSS 'text-rendering'

> Ready to land and pre-approved:

> 1) cross-origin wrappers
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367911
> 2) showModalDialog() https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194404
> 3) XPATH generator: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319768

> Asking for approval:

> 1) SVG tile filter: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373572
>   ** My $.02 is ok
> 2) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319455
>   ** My $.02 is ok
> 3) history menu is slowhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385397
>    ** My $.02 is we really want this

> Patch not reviewed:

> 1) Cross-site XMLHttpRequest
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389508

> Backed out because of perf regression:

> 1) xml:id https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275196

> That was a fun night!   I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of memory
> before...

> Below is my understanding of our current status.  I'd like to try and
> wrap this up today if we can.  Can I get everyones help with the following?

> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here
> b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to
> coordinate with others to land in free window today.  BKap I think you
> are up first...
> c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf
> regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest.  Options for each of these:
>    i) hold a7 and get them in
>    ii) move them to 1.9.1
>    iii) let them slip into a8

> Best,

> Schrep

> Asking for approval:

> 1) SVG tile filter: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373572
>   ** My $.02 is ok
> 2) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319455
>   ** My $.02 is oks

> Patch not reviewed:

> 1) Cross-site XMLHttpRequest
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389508

> Backed out because of perf regression:

> 1) xml:id https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275196

>> That was a fun night!   I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of
>> memory before...

>> Below is my understanding of our current status.  I'd like to try and
>> wrap this up today if we can.  Can I get everyones help with the
>> following?

>> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here
>> b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to
>> coordinate with others to land in free window today.  BKap I think you
>> are up first...
>> c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf
>> regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest.  Options for each of these:
>>    i) hold a7 and get them in
>>    ii) move them to 1.9.1
>>    iii) let them slip into a8

>> Best,

>> Schrep

> I have a bit cleaned-up patch for xml:id waiting for review. It may
> speed up some things which are called a lot. The tp regression wasn't
> very bad, so might be worth to try. (Or was it actually only tp2
> regression. Tp is up anyway on bl-bldlnx03)

> -Olli

> Jonas, if you have any ideas how to still improve the performance of the
> patch, feel free to suggest.

>> If xml:id can't be get into a7, would it still be possible to try to
>> land it before a8.

>> Jonas, if you have any ideas how to still improve the performance of
>> the patch, feel free to suggest.

> Default answer is no.   Why do we want this and what is the regression
> risk?

> Schrep

> I might also suggest:

> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389985
> Bug 389985 - crash [@ XPCWrappedNativeScope::FindInJSObjectScope]

> It's crashed ~20 times for me in the last two days, which is about as
> many total crashes as I've had since early June. :(

> Justin

> We'll continue to hold the tree closed as we knockout the crashes.
> Please flag bugs as blocking 1.9+ with a Target Milestone of  
> mozilla1.9
> M7.  We will use that to track the bugs we went close before release.

> Best,

> Schrep

> Justin Dolske wrote:
>> Jesse Ruderman wrote:
>>> These regressions should be considered for blocking A7:

>> I might also suggest:

>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389985
>> Bug 389985 - crash [@ XPCWrappedNativeScope::FindInJSObjectScope]

>> It's crashed ~20 times for me in the last two days, which is about as
>> many total crashes as I've had since early June. :(

>> Justin
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning