That was a fun night! I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of memory before...
Below is my understanding of our current status. I'd like to try and wrap this up today if we can. Can I get everyones help with the following?
a) Correct anything I've got wrong here b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to coordinate with others to land in free window today. BKap I think you are up first... c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest. Options for each of these: i) hold a7 and get them in ii) move them to 1.9.1 iii) let them slip into a8
> That was a fun night! I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of memory > before...
> Below is my understanding of our current status. I'd like to try and > wrap this up today if we can. Can I get everyones help with the following?
> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here > b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to > coordinate with others to land in free window today. BKap I think you > are up first... > c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf > regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest. Options for each of these: > i) hold a7 and get them in > ii) move them to 1.9.1 > iii) let them slip into a8
> That was a fun night! I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of memory > before...
> Below is my understanding of our current status. I'd like to try and > wrap this up today if we can. Can I get everyones help with the following?
> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here > b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to > coordinate with others to land in free window today. BKap I think you > are up first... > c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf > regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest. Options for each of these: > i) hold a7 and get them in > ii) move them to 1.9.1 > iii) let them slip into a8
> Best,
> Schrep
I have a bit cleaned-up patch for xml:id waiting for review. It may speed up some things which are called a lot. The tp regression wasn't very bad, so might be worth to try. (Or was it actually only tp2 regression. Tp is up anyway on bl-bldlnx03)
smaug wrote: > Mike Schroepfer wrote: >> Hey Folks,
>> That was a fun night! I haven't seen bonsai and tbox run out of >> memory before...
>> Below is my understanding of our current status. I'd like to try and >> wrap this up today if we can. Can I get everyones help with the >> following?
>> a) Correct anything I've got wrong here >> b) If you are pre-approved for landing below can you make sure to >> coordinate with others to land in free window today. BKap I think you >> are up first... >> c) Any opinions on the items asking for approval, the xml:id perf >> regression, or cross-site XMLHttpRequest. Options for each of these: >> i) hold a7 and get them in >> ii) move them to 1.9.1 >> iii) let them slip into a8
>> Best,
>> Schrep
> I have a bit cleaned-up patch for xml:id waiting for review. It may > speed up some things which are called a lot. The tp regression wasn't > very bad, so might be worth to try. (Or was it actually only tp2 > regression. Tp is up anyway on bl-bldlnx03)
> -Olli
If xml:id can't be get into a7, would it still be possible to try to land it before a8.
Jonas, if you have any ideas how to still improve the performance of the patch, feel free to suggest.
With bug 389428, I can "dogfood" trunk the 40% of the time I'm using a site other than Bugzilla and Wikipedia, but with bug 390083 I can't dogfood it at all. I don't see how we can be a day away from releasing a Gecko beta.
We'll continue to hold the tree closed as we knockout the crashes. Please flag bugs as blocking 1.9+ with a Target Milestone of mozilla1.9 M7. We will use that to track the bugs we went close before release.
> We'll continue to hold the tree closed as we knockout the crashes. > Please flag bugs as blocking 1.9+ with a Target Milestone of > mozilla1.9 > M7. We will use that to track the bugs we went close before release.
> Best,
> Schrep
> Justin Dolske wrote: >> Jesse Ruderman wrote: >>> These regressions should be considered for blocking A7: