Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Thunderbird 1.0.8/1.5.0.2 delayed until Friday or Monday

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim Riley

unread,
Apr 20, 2006, 2:25:20 PM4/20/06
to
There are some linux build issues that need to be resolved (bug 334707)
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334707>. We need to avoid
and possible binary compatibility issues so we are delaying these
releases. We will build, re-test and release ASAP. The release should
be tomorrow or Monday.

--Tim

JC

unread,
Apr 20, 2006, 10:13:38 PM4/20/06
to
Mozilla 1.1.13 has been released as a critical update on SuSe Linix
9.3. I just downloaded it using YAST.

Joe

JC

unread,
Apr 20, 2006, 10:14:41 PM4/20/06
to
You know I mean 1.7.13

Axel Hecht

unread,
Apr 21, 2006, 8:47:47 AM4/21/06
to
JC wrote:
> Mozilla 1.1.13 has been released as a critical update on SuSe Linix
> 9.3. I just downloaded it using YAST.

I didn't find that on their site, but did they release a security
announcement for that update?

On the actual release, they have a home grown compile anyway, AFAIK, so
they problem that is keeping us from releasing the binaries doesn't
affect them. Not that I would call it a good citizen thing to release
before we do. But this is more a question of them disclosing
vulnerabilities before we would, thus my question above.

Axel

Robert Marshall

unread,
Apr 21, 2006, 9:14:28 AM4/21/06
to
Axel Hecht wrote:
> JC wrote:
>> Mozilla 1.1.13 has been released as a critical update on SuSe Linix
>> 9.3. I just downloaded it using YAST.
>
> I didn't find that on their site, but did they release a security
> announcement for that update?

<http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Apr/0003.html>
has the title and CVE number for MFSA 2006-21, but nothing for 27 which
is also missing from <http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/>. ;)

Wolfgang Rosenauer

unread,
Apr 24, 2006, 1:49:07 AM4/24/06
to
Axel Hecht wrote:

> On the actual release, they have a home grown compile anyway, AFAIK, so
> they problem that is keeping us from releasing the binaries doesn't
> affect them. Not that I would call it a good citizen thing to release
> before we do. But this is more a question of them disclosing
> vulnerabilities before we would, thus my question above.
>
> Axel

We've planned to release at the same time. For some reasons - which I
don't want to discuss here - the timing wasn't perfect.

Wolfgang

0 new messages