Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.dev.planning
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
draft Thunderbird 3.1 schedule
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dan Mosedale  
View profile  
 More options Dec 18 2009, 1:35 am
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.planning
Followup-To: mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird
From: Dan Mosedale <dm...@mozillamessaging.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:35:23 -0800
Local: Fri, Dec 18 2009 1:35 am
Subject: draft Thunderbird 3.1 schedule
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
  [Note that replies are being directed to the dev-apps-thunderbird list]

I've drafted a schedule for Thunderbird 3.1:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Thunderbird3.1

Some things to note:

* String and features freezes for this release are targeted at the end
of beta 1. If anyone expects to land a feature with > 20 or so strings,
please contact me (dmose) ASAP so that I can coordinate with
localization teams sooner rather than later.

* I've switched from the M1/M2-style milestone naming previously
proposed back to the alpha/beta style naming as a result of previous
discussion here.  I think being more approachable from the outside has
higher value to the project than I had considered.

Thoughts/feedback?  Do the dates proposed make sense?  Do they collide
in any important ways with holidays observed by sizable numbers of
contributors?

Dan


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google