On 10/25/09 12:28 AM, Peter Weilbacher wrote:
> The problem is that check-in rules also change depending on where one
> looks for them.
If there's confusion please bring it to our attention so we can clear it
up (as you now have).
> But anyway, I wonder what this post is really about. Which checkins are
> you complaining about?
There have been a steady trickle of check-ins for branch blockers whose
patches were not yet approved. That is, following the 1.9.2 rules on the