Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion HTML 5 Canvas: Linux Performance Issues
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Boris Zbarsky  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2009, 8:17 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.performance
From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:17:58 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 7 2009 8:17 pm
Subject: Re: HTML 5 Canvas: Linux Performance Issues
On 10/7/09 6:54 PM, Will Daniels wrote:

> After testing a number of different browsers on different platforms, I
> concluded that: Opera is consistently slow, Chromium is consistently
> "swift", and Intel/PGO builds of Firefox are consistently fastest.

Just as a note: none of the Mozilla.org builds are done with icc.  The
Windows builds (which use PGO) are done with MSVC.  Last I checked, icc
porting work was sporadically happening, but not done.

> I'd really like to help improve performance of GCC builds of Firefox,
> but I don't (yet) know anything about whether the PGO capabilities of
> GCC are used in building the Ubuntu Firefox package

Almost certainly not; GCC with PGO enabled ends up with internal errors
in its profiling information bookkeeping if you try to use it on
Firefox.  As in, the PGO is just too buggy to use so far.

The Linux builds mozilla.org ships are not using GCC's PGO either.

> or indeed whether it is PGO primarily that is making the difference here (i.e. perhaps
> the Intel compiler is just that much better at optimising this
> particular arithmetic case).

Just to check... were the Ubuntu builds 64-bit, by any chance?  If so
(and this is my most likely hypothesis at the moment), you're probably
seeing the lack of a 64-bit jit in Firefox 3.5.3's JS engine.  The
mozilla.org builds are 32-bit.

> One thing in particular I'd like to ask here, is whether you keep any
> 3.5.3 Linux binaries that are compiled with the Intel compiler without
> the PGO phase, for comparison?

As I said above, I don't think it's even possible to build Firefox with
icc at the moment.  I could be wrong about that, though!

> PS: If anybody can suggest also why the rendering of my fractal "zoom
> box" (on the mousemove event) is noticeably lagged using the Mozilla
> Linux build, but not the Ubuntu build (or any other build of any other
> browser on any other platform that I tried)

_That_ is really odd.  I'll look into that.

-Boris


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.