Fate of Mozilla Suite and end-user pages
Chris Ilias
to keep the Mozilla Suite product pages[1]?
I ask because I ran across some support pages in /docs/end-user/* [2]
that (I think) should probably be gone.
[1]<http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/>
[2]<http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/>
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia
Philip Chee
Suggestions:
> [1]<http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/>
Delete and redirect to:
<http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>
> [2]<http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/>
Much of this seems still useful to SeaMonkey users. Perhaps move this
(and updating the links) to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/> as well.
Or if there is a SeaMonkey section on SUMO (what dim-bulb came up with
that acronym anyway) you could park it there for the time being.
Phil
--
Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <phili...@gmail.com>
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
[ ]Fax me no questions, I'll Fax you no lies!
* TagZilla 0.066.6
davidwboswell
also thinking of putting a History section on the site to link to out-
of-date but historically interesting content, so some of this content
could also be left on www.mozilla.org as part of that.
David
Chris Ilias
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:17:29 -0500, Chris Ilias wrote:
>
> Suggestions:
>
>> [1]<http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/>
> Delete and redirect to:
> <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>
I would rather point it to something like <http://www.mozilla.org/start/>
See <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373065>.
>> [2]<http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/>
> Much of this seems still useful to SeaMonkey users. Perhaps move this
> (and updating the links) to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/> as well.
Pinging KaiRo. :-)
> Or if there is a SeaMonkey section on SUMO (what dim-bulb came up with
> that acronym anyway) you could park it there for the time being.
Firefox Support (The official name of the project :-) ) is Firefox-only;
but the intent is build a system that other vendors can on their own
domains.
Robert Kaiser
> On 3/4/08 8:34 PM, _Philip Chee_ spoke thusly:
>> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:17:29 -0500, Chris Ilias wrote:
>>> [2]<http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/>
>> Much of this seems still useful to SeaMonkey users. Perhaps move this
>> (and updating the links) to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/> as well.
>
> Pinging KaiRo. :-)
We surely would like to have that content in some way available for
SeaMonkey users, at least 1.x users, yes.
>> Or if there is a SeaMonkey section on SUMO (what dim-bulb came up with
>> that acronym anyway) you could park it there for the time being.
>
> Firefox Support (The official name of the project :-) ) is Firefox-only;
> but the intent is build a system that other vendors can on their own
> domains.
David Tenser implied on FOSDEM that he'd appreciate to have SeaMonkey
stuff on SUMO...
Robert Kaiser
Chris Ilias
> Chris Ilias wrote:
>
>> Firefox Support (The official name of the project :-) ) is Firefox-only;
>> but the intent is build a system that other vendors can on their own
>> domains.
>
> David Tenser implied on FOSDEM that he'd appreciate to have SeaMonkey
> stuff on SUMO...
Do you mean SeaMonkey stuff on support.mozilla.com, or SeaMonkey stuff
on (your own installation of) SUMO (tikiwiki)?
If it's the former, I think should get that clarified with David.
Robert Kaiser
> On 3/5/08 4:39 PM, _Robert Kaiser_ spoke thusly:
>> Chris Ilias wrote:
>>
>>> Firefox Support (The official name of the project :-) ) is Firefox-only;
>>> but the intent is build a system that other vendors can on their own
>>> domains.
>>
>> David Tenser implied on FOSDEM that he'd appreciate to have SeaMonkey
>> stuff on SUMO...
>
>
> Do you mean SeaMonkey stuff on support.mozilla.com, or SeaMonkey stuff
> on (your own installation of) SUMO (tikiwiki)?
>
> If it's the former, I think should get that clarified with David.
>
Well, if support.mozilla.com is supposed to be just Firefox, it should
be support.firefox.com or such, IMHO.
But in which way this way meant specifically, I'm not 100% sure. But if
he meant on a separate installation of tikiwiki, then what's SUMO about
it, we can set any wiki at any time for such a thing, right?
Robert Kaiser
Chris Ilias
> Well, if support.mozilla.com is supposed to be just Firefox, it should
> be support.firefox.com or such, IMHO.
That's an issue beyond the scope of the Firefox Support project.
support.mozilla.com is a sub-domain of mozilla.com, which is the domain
of the Mozilla Corporation, which is Firefox-only (Thunderbird is moving
to mozillamessaging.com). I think I remember a blog post from Ben
Goodger about creating the Firefox Corp., but I can't find it.
> But in which way this way meant specifically, I'm not 100% sure. But if
> he meant on a separate installation of tikiwiki, then what's SUMO about
> it, we can set any wiki at any time for such a thing, right?
Yes, but we're not simply taking tikiwiki and branding it. We've got a
tikiwiki coder on contract, to help us build a system designed for
product user support.
JoeS
> On 3/6/08 6:46 AM, _Robert Kaiser_ spoke thusly:
>> Well, if support.mozilla.com is supposed to be just Firefox, it should
>> be support.firefox.com or such, IMHO.
>
> That's an issue beyond the scope of the Firefox Support project.
> support.mozilla.com is a sub-domain of mozilla.com, which is the domain
> of the Mozilla Corporation, which is Firefox-only (Thunderbird is moving
> to mozillamessaging.com). I think I remember a blog post from Ben
> Goodger about creating the Firefox Corp., but I can't find it.
http://www.bengoodger.com/2007/04/the_autonomous_future.html