> I agree making description simple, but, "Standard global objects"
> should not be changed. Because "Standard" is used to contrast with
But which standard? The word standard can have two meanings here:
1) Normal, ordinary
2) An agreed-upon convention
The first one is imprecise: liveconnect is perfectly normal and ordinary
in some respects. The second one is what you mean. That's why I suggest
using a specific name rather than "standard".
I also suggest using the agreed-upon convention for naming these
Global Scope". By calling them "global objects" you right away fall in
the the confusion you were trying to clarify with the paragraph in the