- Several bug fixes and data improvements; the Firefox percentages have gone up but, sadly, so have the IE ones.
- Information on Opera.
- A new line showing how IE fares if you don't include LIPs.
- A new line for "registered l10n teams"
- A tab which shows that _if_ a browser team were using this data to guide where to put l10n team effort, what languages they should be focussing on. This data is provided for Firefox, IE and Opera.
Thank you to everyone who gave me useful feedback. Please let me know of any further improvements I could make, within the general parameters of the method.
this time I took a closer look at the figures, too. When I tried to find out why you "recommend" Belarussian to Microsoft, I came across your numbers for Kurdish. You list the number of speakers with 1,687,500. This is way too low.
According to SIL, which is one of the authorities, the total number of speakers for Kurmanci, the Kurdish variant that the Kurdish team works in, is 9,113,505. (http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=kmr)
I don't ask you to change the recommendation to Microsoft, but please correct the number of Kurdish speakers accordingly. I dont' argue for one million more or less, but 9 millions against 1 million is a bit of a difference.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org> wrote: > There is an updated version of my data here: > http://www.gerv.net/hacking/l10n-stats/ > I thought a web page is probably better than a blog post.
> Among the new features are:
> - Several bug fixes and data improvements; the Firefox percentages have > gone up but, sadly, so have the IE ones.
> - Information on Opera.
> - A new line showing how IE fares if you don't include LIPs.
> - A new line for "registered l10n teams"
> - A tab which shows that _if_ a browser team were using this data to > guide where to put l10n team effort, what languages they should be > focussing on. This data is provided for Firefox, IE and Opera.
> Thank you to everyone who gave me useful feedback. Please let me know of > any further improvements I could make, within the general parameters of > the method.
Michael Wolf wrote: > Which figure did you take as basis for the world net population?
Those figures are per-country, and are mostly from the CIA World Factbook. Better figures for a particular country are welcome (I've already had some for Chinese).
> And, I propose to emphasize the data for Firefox (languages, figures) by > other color, bold, or italics.
Could do. Exactly which Firefox figures, though? After 3.0 has been out for a few weeks, and the few packs we are waiting for have arrived, it'll be more clear.
Erdal Ronahi wrote: > this time I took a closer look at the figures, too. When I tried to > find out why you "recommend" Belarussian to Microsoft, I came across > your numbers for Kurdish. You list the number of speakers with > 1,687,500. This is way too low.
It is important to remember that these are not total speakers, they are total speakers in the Net population.
I currently have Kurdish down as 9% of the population of Iran. The net population of Iran is 18,000,000 - leading to the figure of 1,687,500. (That's slightly more than 18,000,000 * 0.09 because I don't have figures for everyone in Iran, and the unknowns are distributed proportionally among the languages I do have figures for.)
I know that there are Kurdish people in Turkey and Syria, at least. If you are able to point me at good language breakdowns for those countries, or better figures for Iran, then I could make a change.
Belarusian is the figure it is because currently I have 100% of the net population of Belarus (5478000) down as speaking Belarusian. Again, if you have a better breakdown, I would be happy to hear it.
> Those figures are per-country, and are mostly from the CIA World > Factbook. Better figures for a particular country are welcome (I've > already had some for Chinese).
Thanks. But, what I meant is that you should mention the figure on your web site.
> Could do. Exactly which Firefox figures, though? After 3.0 has been out > for a few weeks, and the few packs we are waiting for have arrived, > it'll be more clear.
I didn't mean any concrete figures, just the figures which are relevant for Fx and are mentioned in the FAQ to emphasize the current state.
Michael Wolf wrote: > Gervase Markham napisa: >> Those figures are per-country, and are mostly from the CIA World >> Factbook. Better figures for a particular country are welcome (I've >> already had some for Chinese).
> Thanks. But, what I meant is that you should mention the figure on your > web site.
Done.
> I didn't mean any concrete figures, just the figures which are relevant > for Fx and are mentioned in the FAQ to emphasize the current state.
> Michael Wolf wrote: >> Which figure did you take as basis for the world net population?
> Those figures are per-country, and are mostly from the CIA World > Factbook. Better figures for a particular country are welcome (I've > already had some for Chinese).
CIA number for Czech net population is 3.541.000. But net population in Czech is growing ... so now we have 4.816.393