Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How to reclassify Bug 325458?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Chris Hardie

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 10:39:40 AM1/13/10
to dev-apps-t...@lists.mozilla.org
Greetings.

As noted in the exchange below with Brian Lu, this bug, "Bug 325458 -
Nickname not highest precedence for matching," is being described by a
number of users on bugzilla and in the related "Getsatisfaction.com"
conversations as a major loss of function. As one user noted, "anything
that causes mail to get sent to the wrong user inadvertently is just
about he worst possible problem a mailer can have."

The bug entry is currently classified as an enhancement request. I'm
hoping you can point me to the right process for getting the bug
reclassified as a loss of functionality so that it can get the
appropriate attention.

Thanks for your help.
Chris

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325458

http://www.getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/address_book_nicknames_dont_work_in_thunderbird_3


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Bug 325458 - Nickname not highest precedence for matching
address book entries
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:02:31 +0800
From: Brian Lu <Bria...@Sun.COM>
To: Chris Hardie <ch...@summersault.com>

Chris,

I agree it should be reclassiefied. Since I'm still not a community
developer,
I don't know if there any process to do that.

I suggest you to send an e-mail to dev-apps-t...@lists.mozilla.org
You can get help there.

Regards

Brian

On 01/13/10 00:41, Chris Hardie wrote:
> Boying Lu,
>
> I apologize if this is an improper way to contact you about a
> Thunderbird bug - feel free to redirect me to another path.
>
> On this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325458
>
> a number of us feel that it should be reclassified from "Enhancement" to
> "Major Loss of Function." Do you know what the process is to have that
> reclassification take place?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
>
> Chris
>
>

Nikolay Shopik

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 10:49:52 AM1/13/10
to Chris Hardie
On 13.01.2010 18:39, Chris Hardie wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> As noted in the exchange below with Brian Lu, this bug, "Bug 325458 -
> Nickname not highest precedence for matching," is being described by a
> number of users on bugzilla and in the related "Getsatisfaction.com"
> conversations as a major loss of function. As one user noted, "anything
> that causes mail to get sent to the wrong user inadvertently is just
> about he worst possible problem a mailer can have."
>
> The bug entry is currently classified as an enhancement request. I'm
> hoping you can point me to the right process for getting the bug
> reclassified as a loss of functionality so that it can get the
> appropriate attention.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Chris
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325458
>
> http://www.getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/address_book_nicknames_dont_work_in_thunderbird_3
>

Hello Chris,

This feature never exist in Thunderbird so it treated as enhancement
request as all other bugs.

Chris Hardie

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 10:54:47 AM1/13/10
to dev-apps-t...@lists.mozilla.org
On 1/13/10 10:49 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:

> Hello Chris,
>
> This feature never exist in Thunderbird so it treated as enhancement
> request as all other bugs.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "never exist in Thunderbird."

Before upgrading to TB3, I could type in a nickname of a contact and it
would be the highest ranking match for the address that was filled in
with autocomplete. After upgrading to TB3, when I type in a nickname,
it is no longer the highest ranking match. So, I and others are now
accidentally sending messages to the wrong contacts because we're
expecting the nickname functionality to work.

I hope that helps.

Chris

Wayne Mery

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 10:56:14 AM1/13/10
to
On 1/13/2010 10:39 AM, Chris Hardie wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> As noted in the exchange below with Brian Lu, this bug, "Bug 325458 -
> Nickname not highest precedence for matching," is being described by a
> number of users on bugzilla and in the related "Getsatisfaction.com"
> conversations as a major loss of function. As one user noted, "anything
> that causes mail to get sent to the wrong user inadvertently is just
> about he worst possible problem a mailer can have."
>
> The bug entry is currently classified as an enhancement request. I'm
> hoping you can point me to the right process for getting the bug
> reclassified as a loss of functionality so that it can get the
> appropriate attention.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Chris
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325458
>
> http://www.getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/address_book_nicknames_dont_work_in_thunderbird_3

That's *entirely* the wrong bug for people to be in for issues about a
v3 regression of email frequency not being honored.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497722

--
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Testing
http://www.spreadthunderbird.com/aff/165/

Nikolay Shopik

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 11:00:45 AM1/13/10
to Chris Hardie

I've read original reporter comment and it say's nothing about
regression. If that worked in 2.0 this bug should be closed and you need
to open new bug about changed precedence and put keyword regression in it.

0 new messages