> On 16/06/2011 11:12 AM, neandr wrote: >> Thought using /thunderbird -debugger >> would start TB and debugger at once.
>> Not the case here.
>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110615 Thunderbird/5.0b2pre >> JavaScript Debugger 0.9.88.2 (bumped for TB5)
>> G nter
> Is that the real .2 or .1 with the version changed for TB5? The real .2 > includes a fix for JSD asynchronous starting, included in TB5.
> Gijs
From my install {f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}.xpi here are the current details in install.rdf:
<em:version>0.9.88.2</em:version> for TB: <em:maxVersion>7.0a1</em:maxVersion> for SM: <em:maxVersion>2.4a1</em:maxVersion> for FX: <em:maxVersion>5.*</em:maxVersion>
Don't know if important for start process: No entry for <em:unpack> so the XPI is stored as {..}.XPI to profile directory (see above)
> Am 16.06.2011 11:22, schrieb Gijs Kruitbosch: >> On 16/06/2011 11:12 AM, neandr wrote: >>> Thought using /thunderbird -debugger >>> would start TB and debugger at once.
>>> Not the case here.
>>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110615 Thunderbird/5.0b2pre >>> JavaScript Debugger 0.9.88.2 (bumped for TB5)
>>> G nter
>> Is that the real .2 or .1 with the version changed for TB5? The real .2 >> includes a fix for JSD asynchronous starting, included in TB5.
>> Gijs
> From my install {f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}.xpi here are the current > details in install.rdf:
> <em:version>0.9.88.2</em:version> > for TB: <em:maxVersion>7.0a1</em:maxVersion> > for SM: <em:maxVersion>2.4a1</em:maxVersion> > for FX: <em:maxVersion>5.*</em:maxVersion>
> Don't know if important for start process: No entry for <em:unpack> > so the XPI is stored as {..}.XPI to profile directory (see above)
That wasn't what I meant to ask. You wrote "bumped for TB5". So I wanted to know if you changed the version of the 0.9.88.1 XPI file manually, or genuinely installed 0.9.88.2.
For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that helps.
> On 16/06/2011 11:55 AM, neandr wrote: >> Am 16.06.2011 11:22, schrieb Gijs Kruitbosch: >>> On 16/06/2011 11:12 AM, neandr wrote: >>>> Thought using /thunderbird -debugger >>>> would start TB and debugger at once.
>>>> Not the case here.
>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110615 >>>> Thunderbird/5.0b2pre >>>> JavaScript Debugger 0.9.88.2 (bumped for TB5)
>>>> G nter
>>> Is that the real .2 or .1 with the version changed for TB5? The real .2 >>> includes a fix for JSD asynchronous starting, included in TB5.
>>> Gijs
>> From my install {f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}.xpi here are >> the current >> details in install.rdf:
>> <em:version>0.9.88.2</em:version> >> for TB: <em:maxVersion>7.0a1</em:maxVersion> >> for SM: <em:maxVersion>2.4a1</em:maxVersion> >> for FX: <em:maxVersion>5.*</em:maxVersion>
>> Don't know if important for start process: No entry for <em:unpack> >> so the XPI is stored as {..}.XPI to profile directory (see above)
> That wasn't what I meant to ask. You wrote "bumped for TB5". So I wanted > to know if you changed the version of the 0.9.88.1 XPI file manually, or > genuinely installed 0.9.88.2.
> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that helps.
> Gijs
Sorry for confusion .. had to bump in the past, so maybe I didn't remembered if it was done here also. But ok, I did a deinstall of Venkman, restarted, downloaded from AMO 0.9.88.2., restarted, activated Venkman. So far all OK. Stopped TB; used /thunderbird -debugger (as described with first post), TB started but Venkman NOT!
And here is somemore details with starting from console:
1. I had fire/chromebug active, got: ~$ /var/mozilla/thunderbird5/thunderbird -debugger Turned on JSD at startup Chromebug Command Line Handler taking arguments from state:0 Chromebug Command Line Handler arguments on cmdLine: 1.0)-debugger Warning: unrecognized command line flag -debugger
> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that helps.
BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty please? ;-)
Robert kaiser
-- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)
> On 16/06/2011 19:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >>> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that >>> helps.
>> BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty >> please? ;-)
>> Robert kaiser
> Done.
Done for 'hg repo' and not already solved the startup situation?
> Am 16.06.2011 23:06, schrieb Gijs Kruitbosch: >> On 16/06/2011 19:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >>>> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that >>>> helps.
>>> BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty >>> please? ;-)
>>> Robert kaiser
>> Done.
> Done for 'hg repo' and not already solved the startup situation?
> Günter
Yeah, solving the startup situation is going to take considerably more work than committing a single character textfile change to an hg repo, I'm afraid, and I'm not sure if/when I will have the time to investigate this further... Have you checked if there are already bugs on file about this? There might be...
> On 16/06/2011 23:27 PM, neandr wrote: >> Am 16.06.2011 23:06, schrieb Gijs Kruitbosch: >>> On 16/06/2011 19:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>>> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >>>>> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that >>>>> helps.
>>>> BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty >>>> please? ;-)
>>>> Robert kaiser
>>> Done.
>> Done for 'hg repo' and not already solved the startup situation?
>> G nter
> Yeah, solving the startup situation is going to take considerably more > work than committing a single character textfile change to an hg repo, > I'm afraid, and I'm not sure if/when I will have the time to investigate > this further... Have you checked if there are already bugs on file about > this? There might be...
> Sorry, > Gijs
Thanks for clarification .. not that important to have it started automatically .. a nice to have feature. Greetings G nter
> On 16/06/2011 19:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >>> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that >>> helps.
>> BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty >> please? ;-)
>> Robert kaiser
> Done.
Thanks. So all the AMO version had changed was the version number? Also good to know. ;-)
Though I guess the install.rdf maxVersion settings in the source could be adopted to current Nightlies out there as well...
(Oh, and I already have submitted a German langpack to AMO for this and the current cZ version.)
Robert Kaiser
-- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)
> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >> On 16/06/2011 19:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> Gijs Kruitbosch schrieb: >>>> For good measure, try installing 0.9.88.2 from AMO and see if that >>>> helps.
>>> BTW, can we have that version in the venkman hg repo as well, pretty >>> please? ;-)
>>> Robert kaiser
>> Done.
> Thanks. So all the AMO version had changed was the version number? Also good to > know. ;-)
> Though I guess the install.rdf maxVersion settings in the source could be > adopted to current Nightlies out there as well...
> (Oh, and I already have submitted a German langpack to AMO for this and the > current cZ version.)
> Robert Kaiser
Well, from trunk. There were some fixes to actually make it *work* on 'new' versions of Firefox/TB/Seamonkey/XULRunner/etc. compared to the .1 release. Not much else, that I recall.
I didn't want to change the rest of the maxversions in the source because I am actually unsure how well it works on current nightlies...
> Well, from trunk. There were some fixes to actually make it *work* on > 'new' versions of Firefox/TB/Seamonkey/XULRunner/etc. compared to the .1 > release. Not much else, that I recall.
Sure: I just was talking in terms of changes between what was on the repo and what was released on AMO.
> I didn't want to change the rest of the maxversions in the source > because I am actually unsure how well it works on current nightlies...
I understand. I haven't done much testing myself recently. And we all know that the current JSDs days are probably counted.
Robert Kaiser
-- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)
