Rhino 1.7.R3/4 licensing
43 views
Skip to first unread message
Tim Fox
May 21, 2012, 9:51:03 PM5/21/12
to mozill...@googlegroups.com
Rhino 1.7R3 is currently licensed under the MPL 1.1.
Just wondering if there is any reason why MPL 2.0 is not used?
MPL 1.1 is problematic. Under the Apache guidelines any MPL1.1
dependencies should only be distributed in binary form.
And some companies take an even stricter view on MPL.
The MPL 2.0 is generally more compatible and better accepted. Would be
much better if Rhino used the MPL 2.0 imho. Considering the MPL was
written by Mozilla, hopefully this will be possible? ;)
Just wondering if there is any reason why MPL 2.0 is not used?
MPL 1.1 is problematic. Under the Apache guidelines any MPL1.1
dependencies should only be distributed in binary form.
And some companies take an even stricter view on MPL.
The MPL 2.0 is generally more compatible and better accepted. Would be
much better if Rhino used the MPL 2.0 imho. Considering the MPL was
written by Mozilla, hopefully this will be possible? ;)
Hannes Wallnöfer
May 22, 2012, 4:35:36 AM5/22/12
to mozill...@googlegroups.com
Update of Rhino license to MPL 2.0 is underway (I just learned).
Please track this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754258
Hannes
2012/5/22 Tim Fox <timv...@gmail.com>:
Please track this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754258
Hannes
2012/5/22 Tim Fox <timv...@gmail.com>:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages