Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Chromeless full-screen web browser
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Joanna Pierożek  
View profile  
 More options Apr 18, 1:42 pm
From: Joanna Pierożek <a...@gmusicbrowser.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Apr 18 2009 1:42 pm
Subject: [PROTOTYPE] Chromeless full-screen web browser
<b >Prototype:</b>

<br /><a href="http://akai.opsat.net/mozprototype/index.html">http://
akai.opsat.net/mozprototype/index.html</a>

<b >Short Summary:</b>
An attempt at integrating all the features of modern web browsers into
a fullscreen-only interface, providing maximal visibility of the
website at all times and effortless and fast access to all the
functions both with mouse and keyboard-only input.

<br /><b >Description:</b><br />
The usage of fullscreen mode in web browsers:<br />
A research about what the fullscreen mode is being used for by web
browsers users would be handy, but for the moment let's assume it's
being used:
</br>* when the user wants to maximize the screen real estate
dedicated to viewing websites
</br>* when the user wants to browse the net without the disturbances
from other applications
</br>* on internet kiosks and other appliances dedicated solely to web
browsing
</br>* on devices with screens so small a decent web browsing
experience can only be achieved by dedicating all of the screen real
estate to this activity (like MIDs and, to some extent, netbooks)

<br />Considering these assumptions a fullscreen interface of a web
browser:
* should provide maximal visibility of the website itself, preferably
staying hidden when it's not needed
* should provide enough information the user is used to having around
at all times while using his computer that the user wouldn't need to
quit the fullscreen mode frequently to have a glimpse at his desktop
instead (ie. to check the time or the alarms about his upcoming
appointments or incoming mail) or to access a control essential while
web browsing like the volume control
<br /> Additionally:
* preferably all functions available to the user in the normal mode of
the browser should also be available in the fullscreen mode – cutting
down functionality may be right for kiosks or extremely small devices,
but at least some users of regular machines would like a regular
featureset even in fullscreen mode, especially if it's to be used
regularly and not just as an emergency
* the interface should be usable (and to some extent geared towards
such usage) on small devices with controls different or limited
compared to a regular desktop computer

<br />My proposal focuses on handy mouse input, inspired by the
principles derived from the Fitt's law (the interface elements are
accessed by reaching the edges of the screen with the mouse pointer
and pie menus replace traditional menus) with additional focus on
keyboard-only input which could be handy for laptop users on the go
with no mouse at their disposal. The keyboard input isn't based on
traditional keyboard shortcuts though, but on choosing and interacting
with the interface elements appearing on the screen, which are placed
in such a way that it's easy to browse through them with keyboard
arrows.

<br /> In its current form my proposal isn't meant for touchscreen
users, though it could be tweaked for their needs (ie. by replacing
the need to reach screen edges to access interface elements by panning
the interface beyond the borders of the website, adding additional
means of getting to the menus for touchscreen devices that don't
emulate right and middle clicks etc.)

<br />As far as the user expertise goes it's meant to be very handy to
use after some initial getting used to, while having a reasonable
(though certainly present) learning curve, that should be addressed by
an initial tutorial.

<br /> The interface consists of four panels at the edges of the
screen that only pop out when called up and disappear after the user
performs the chosen action or dismisses them (for the keyboard input)
or when the mouse pointer leaves them. The panels also offer a
possibility to be docked permanently, but I'd consider it optional.
All the other elements of the interface are pie menus that follow the
mouse pointer, surrounding it when called up and collapse after the
user chooses an action.<br />

Additionally, to be comfortable to use without using the mouse pointer
to navigate the websites, the fullscreen browser should be shifting
focus on the clickable elements of the website right as the user is
panning the content with the keyboard arrows.<br />

<br /><b>About me:</b>
<br />My name is Joanna Pierozek. I'm a cognitive science student at
the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland.

<br /><b>Mockup:</b>
<br /><a href="http://akai.opsat.net/mozconcept/index.html">http://
akai.opsat.net/mozconcept/index.html</a>

<br /><i> This work is licensed under a <a href="http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution
3.0 United States License</a> </i>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
iggy  
View profile  
 More options Apr 19, 2:23 am
From: iggy <mjdetwi...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 19 2009 2:23 am
Subject: Re: Chromeless full-screen web browser
I HAVE BEEN THINKING ALONG THE SAME LINES AND WILL BE POSTING A LINK
TO MY WEBSITE SOON BUT JUST WANTED TO COMMENT ON ONE THING. I THINK
THERE ARE A GREAT MANY PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF WHO CANT STAND PIE MENU'S! I
FIND THEM SO ANNOYING THAT IF FIREFOX SWITCHED TO THEM I WOULD
SERIOUSLY CONSIDER SWITCHING BROWSERS! PLEASE, NO PIE MENU'S,  THERE
ARE FAR BETTER WAYS!

On Apr 18, 10:42 am, Joanna Pierożek <a...@gmusicbrowser.org> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
akai  
View profile  
 More options Apr 20, 1:57 pm
From: akai <a...@gmusicbrowser.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 20 2009 1:57 pm
Subject: Re: Chromeless full-screen web browser

> I HAVE BEEN THINKING ALONG THE SAME LINES AND WILL BE POSTING A LINK
> TO MY WEBSITE SOON BUT JUST WANTED TO COMMENT ON ONE THING. I THINK
> THERE ARE A GREAT MANY PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF WHO CANT STAND PIE MENU'S! I
> FIND THEM SO ANNOYING THAT IF FIREFOX SWITCHED TO THEM I WOULD
> SERIOUSLY CONSIDER SWITCHING BROWSERS! PLEASE, NO PIE MENU'S,  THERE
> ARE FAR BETTER WAYS!

Well, it's a concept not something heading for implementation
tomorrow. If user testing proved that pie menus are too alien for most
people because they're so uncommon to the point of either not working
as well as they should (ie. not providing more efficiency than
traditional menus - though I doubt that considering all the research
that went already into supporting the claim that they are more
efficient indeed) or provoking very negative feelings about the
product they'd have to be changed to something else. I think that for
a concept which has making different actions performed during web
browsing faster and more eifficient to perform for its goal pie menus
are a valid element. There's nothing inherent about them that I can
think of that humans in general shouldn't like.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google