Received: by 10.52.64.173 with SMTP id p13mr5836214vds.0.1321638029215;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:40:29 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: mootools-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.239.19 with SMTP id ku19ls2132942vcb.4.canary; Fri, 18 Nov
 2011 09:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.35.206 with SMTP id k14mr5762062vdj.5.1321638023380;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.35.206 with SMTP id k14mr5762059vdj.5.1321638023370;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <sa...@figureone.com>
Received: from rproxy1-a.cypressintegrated.com (rproxy1-a.cypressintegrated.com. [69.28.242.152])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bu17si681137vdc.0.2011.11.18.09.40.23
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sa...@figureone.com designates 69.28.242.152 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.28.242.152;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sa...@figureone.com designates 69.28.242.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sa...@figureone.com
Received: from bad.dop.co ([192.168.87.152])
        by rproxy1-a.cypressintegrated.com (Brand New Heavy v1.0) with ASMTP id BCG65722
        for <mootools-users@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:40:22 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:39:19 -0500
From: Sanford Whiteman <sa...@figureone.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <226116428.20111118123919@figureone.com>
To: Olmo Maldonado <mootools-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Moo] Re: IE9 adds width and height attribute to new Element('img')
In-Reply-To: <CABo60Pm3G8wRPmsm6+vrTdS+nskfE4kg_jQkZBnTCy2OqHaM9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a19009b9-5b58-4d5b-a2ef-8a4eea483ef9@h30g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <7d349ecd-ef25-475a-ad09-18824d4bbbb9@h30g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <CABo60Pm3G8wRPmsm6+vrTdS+nskfE4kg_jQkZBnTCy2OqHaM9Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Hrm.. I'm confused what'd be the problem if IE9 (or other browsers) adds
> attributes to the tag?

Changes  the display size from auto (file dimensions) to a fixed size,
n'eh? Not that we are supposed to be use using auto....

-- S.