Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mono-cecil
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
readonly version
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Simon  
View profile  
 More options Jul 17 2012, 7:21 pm
From: Simon <simon.cr...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 17 2012 7:21 pm
Subject: readonly version
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

JB

Out of curiosity how much faster could Cecil be if there was a readonly
version?
That is if u didnt need to worry about saving or modifying IL and was only
returning it for analysis purposes


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jb Evain  
View profile  
 More options Jul 18 2012, 3:02 am
From: Jb Evain <jbev...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:02:37 +0200
Local: Wed, Jul 18 2012 3:02 am
Subject: Re: [mono-cecil] readonly version
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hi,

It's hardly possible to give a meaningful figure.
But I don't think it would account for much.

On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:21 AM, Simon wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Greg Young  
View profile  
 More options Jul 18 2012, 3:06 am
From: Greg Young <gregoryyou...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:06:38 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 18 2012 3:06 am
Subject: Re: [mono-cecil] readonly version
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I researched this a while ago for MM (when looking at development of
lowmemuse). It did not seem to be a significant amount of overhead
caused by code there for writing capabilities. Maybe eek out a few %
but overall the performance did not seem to be there.

--
Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est absurde.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon  
View profile  
 More options Jul 18 2012, 4:31 am
From: Simon <simon.cr...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jul 18 2012 4:31 am
Subject: Re: [mono-cecil] readonly version
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

I was thinking that since most things could be assumed to be immutable the
reading of the assembly could make use of multiple cores.

Would this not make a significant difference?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jb Evain  
View profile  
 More options Jul 18 2012, 6:34 am
From: Jb Evain <jbev...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:34:49 +0200
Local: Wed, Jul 18 2012 6:34 am
Subject: Re: [mono-cecil] readonly version
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Simon wrote:

> I was thinking that since most things could be assumed to be immutable the reading of the assembly could make use of multiple cores.

> Would this not make a significant difference?

In that case, no, I don't think it would make a significant difference. You'd spend a lot of time synchronizing given how the metadata is interwoven.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google