Received: by 10.90.33.2 with SMTP id g2mr947348agg.8.1287389071096;
        Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: mongodb-user@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.91.196.38 with SMTP id y38ls557855agp.0.p; Mon, 18 Oct 2010
 01:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.100.14 with SMTP id x14mr84750agb.25.1287389067142; Mon, 18
 Oct 2010 01:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by g18g2000yqk.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:04:27
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=oa9BZEfZzHkeK3rikPtUkNaQ+0=ET3JESxFUA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 78.156.124.12
References: <AANLkTin_fYjJRdq2Kqko5sj9b_gQWD9Q4WUV=D+kdGks@mail.gmail.com>
 <289a0c50-73df-4056-b739-07f876beefda@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <AANLkTik+rGS7U4xjQT9ZZ=ukxSOjocTi2z+sKcY1-6vC@mail.gmail.com>
 <9d2f193a-1e44-4ac0-89e4-040acea9ad54@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <AANLkTi=oa9BZEfZzHkeK3rikPtUkNaQ+0=ET3JESxFUA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US)
 AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/6.0.472.63 Safari/534.3,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <820db72b-bd98-4b3f-9644-1a1ad973af59@g18g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Preview version 0.5 of a 10gen supported C# Driver for MongoDB available
From: Christian <spar...@gmail.com>
To: mongodb-user <mongodb-user@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I like that idea

Sometimes its nice to work with LINQ an strongly typed classes like in
NoRM, but sometimes it's much more flexible to work with a list of
keys and values especially when designing an API to be used across
platforms etc.

And the 10gen driver seems to work pretty well already, I'm still
amazed by the speed of MongoDB and how easy it is to get a project
going.

Maybe I haven't found it in the new driver yet, but you can call
ToJson() on a BsonDocument, I would like to see an option to get a
BsonDocumet from a Json string :)

--
Christian

On 18 Okt., 03:19, Eliot Horowitz <eliothorow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think its the second. =A0So things like NoRM can be built on top of
> the official underpinning.
> No reason to have multiple versions of the bson/network layer, and
> then we can optimize it a lot, and also make sure its consistent with
> other languages.