Received: by 10.59.1.102 with SMTP id bf6mr5185222ved.21.1350582733682; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:52:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: mongodb-user@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.20.7 with SMTP id j7ls1040001vde.0.gmail; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.28.45 with SMTP id y13mr3859352vdg.10.1350582723299; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:52:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Helman To: mongodb-user@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <9ae81f93-ea97-4d07-9be3-ad79ececab08@googlegroups.com> <1fb1a3d6-987d-4adb-a8a0-07c7f7175b5e@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Mongo performance and momory usage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2_12214960.1350582722941" ------=_Part_2_12214960.1350582722941 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3_10825717.1350582722941" ------=_Part_3_10825717.1350582722941 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since there is no longer a global lock, there could actually be multiple databases locked at the same time - this will increase the lock percentage because the usage of the different locks is summed (not averaged). Does this make sense? ------=_Part_3_10825717.1350582722941 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since there is no longer a global lock, there could actually be multiple databases locked at the same time - this will increase the lock percentage because the usage of the different locks is summed (not averaged).  Does this make sense?


------=_Part_3_10825717.1350582722941-- ------=_Part_2_12214960.1350582722941--