Message from discussion
cannot start mongodb 2.2.0 on Fedora 17
Received: by 10.66.77.66 with SMTP id q2mr1110965paw.8.1349703335986;
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: mongodb-user@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.197.163 with SMTP id iv3ls22323892pbc.9.gmail; Mon, 08 Oct
2012 06:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.225.234 with SMTP id rn10mr4395551pbc.3.1349703323243;
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Edouard Perov <edouardpe...@gmail.com>
To: mongodb-user@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <ac1a0058-15be-44ae-9007-ee107de6d90c@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <506FCDC2.7080100@gmail.com>
References: <87b1a2e8-6491-45ec-86f7-9ca9140bee5d@googlegroups.com>
<506FCDC2.7080100@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mongodb-user] cannot start mongodb 2.2.0 on Fedora 17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_608_4946939.1349703322251"
------=_Part_608_4946939.1349703322251
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_609_28876010.1349703322251"
------=_Part_609_28876010.1349703322251
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thank you very much.
I am new to MongoDB, we use Oracle for decades and
now thinking if we can replace some applications that do not require "heavy
weight" databases.
The choice is between Oracle NoSQL MongoDB, some others might be.
This example shows that MongoDB does not work "out of box",
to make it working requires "dances with drums" around it,
MongoDB team has not provided any help after several days, which is
critical for our customers' 24x7 systems.
Might be it is acceptable for home playing, student projects, non-critical
applications, ...
but for us the good, fast, and reliable support from all third party
software vendors is mandatory otherwise we loose customers and might be
even sued for damage.
Probably, some kind of commercial license with MongoDB is available, I am
not quite familiar with that, but in this case would it be cheaper for us
and customers than Oracle?
Most people prefer to use well known brands despite of the price: Mercedes,
BMW, Buick, ... vs Dacia, Great Wall, Lada ...
i.e. quality and reliability vs price.
------=_Part_609_28876010.1349703322251
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you very much.<br>I am new to MongoDB, we use Oracle for decades and =
<br>now thinking if we can replace some applications that do not require "h=
eavy weight" databases.<br>The choice is between Oracle NoSQL MongoDB, some=
others might be.<br>This example shows that MongoDB does not work "out of =
box",<br>to make it working requires "dances with drums" around it,<br>Mong=
oDB team has not provided any help after several days, which is critical fo=
r our customers' 24x7 systems.<br><br>Might be it is acceptable for home pl=
aying, student projects, non-critical applications, ...<br>but for us the g=
ood, fast, and reliable support from all third party software vendors is ma=
ndatory otherwise we loose customers and might be even sued for damage.<br>=
Probably, some kind of commercial license with MongoDB is available, I am n=
ot quite familiar with that, but in this case would it be cheaper for us an=
d customers than Oracle?<br>Most people prefer to use well known brands des=
pite of the price: Mercedes, BMW, Buick, ... vs Dacia, Great Wall, Lada ...=
<br>i.e. quality and reliability vs price.<br>
------=_Part_609_28876010.1349703322251--
------=_Part_608_4946939.1349703322251--