Those who want to deny what science does know about something
will use any excuse to do so. I wasn't aware until the
denialists bigged up the importance of this hack that
anyone really thought the CRU at the University of East Anglia to be
the be all and end all of climate research.
> Can someone please even the score and hack the clean coal lobby
> groups, Exxon Mobil and various denial groups that constantly massage
> the figures and mislead the public.
Probably better for someone who wants someone else with technical skills
they have not got to risk going to jail over something criminal
either to spend their own time acquiring these skills if they
consider these ends to justify these means, or alternatively to
research what climate change denial groups have published or what is published
about them in order to expose where they get their funding and
inconsistencies and cover ups available within the published or
researchable record, e.g. by going through their garbage cans and
reconstructing shredded documents. BTW, in case you are interested,
the great majority of information security breaches arise through
traditional detective work and social engineering, while far fewer occur
as a consequence of sophisticated technical attacks.
> We need to expose them too. Of course, this is unethical, an eye for
> an eye. But fairness must be restored.
Whatever can be said of the legality, your proposed activity
is either unethical or fair but not both.
> Whoever pulled off this hack would be hailed as a hero for centuries
> to come. They would get in the history books and will have helped save
> the planet- and will be proven to have had just cause.
It seems unlikely to me that anyone who would carry out a similar
level of intrusion into the denialist side would do so without
being smart enough to be able to cover his/her tracks at least to
the point where the resulting plausible deniability would make
it impossible to prove they did it. Let those who publish in
their own name take the credit - they will probably be those
who have done the donkey work of phoning up pretending to be
someone else and going through garbage cans and reconstructing
shredded documents, e.g. as occurred some years ago when investigators
who had previously been taken in by them, published details
discrediting the fraudulent activities of a bunch of criminal
US televangelists.
Richard Kay.
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Monbiot Discussions" group.
> To post to this group, send email to monbiot...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> monbiot-discu...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/monbiot-discuss?hl=en.
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.427 / Virus Database: 270.14.115/2576 - Release Date: 12/19/09
19:40:00
I've been able to look at a small percentage of the messages
and am likely to continue mostly lurking in the background.
Anway, hope you're all OK.
Richard.
BTW, please do continue to use my ri...@copsewood.net address if you
want to message me personally. The gmail.com one won't
get looked at often other than by mostly automated systems.