I would like you to read the 
following..this is a New Zealand Politican that was voted out, now loves his 
life and has written quite frankly about our political system..I think you will 
enjoy this .....
 
Former Napier MP Russell Fairbrother Happier now
he's out of 
Parliament
 
By 
Neill Gordon of HB Country 
Scene
 
 
Parliament was like a prison for former Napier MP 
Russell
Fairbrother.
 
Napier people did him a favour voting him 
out last year,
ending six "wasted years" in politics, he 
says.
 
Initially seduced by appointments to influential 
committees
and his anointing as a future Attorney General, he ended 
up
feeling trapped in a system that prioritised patch protection
and power 
instead of what politics is truly about: "improving
the life of 
individuals."
 
"I just couldn't click into the thought pro- cess. I 
could never
get my head round it. I'd get on that plane [to Wellington] on
Tuesday 
morning and my heart would sink.
 
I'd think 'I just hate this' 
".
 
The conditions at Parliament were tougher than at 
Mangaroa
Prison, he says.
 
He'd arrive at seven in the morning, 
couldn't leave till 10 at
night, and couldn't leave the premises without 
permission
from a party whip.
 
"So you're trapped in this 
building 15 hours a day, three days
a week... I felt 
imprisoned."
 
Parliament's stupidly long hours manufacture poor 
decisions,
the 65-year-old says.
 
"You've got middle-aged people 
who are on the go from at
least seven in the morning till at least 10 at 
night and you
point me to 45, 55, 65-year-olds who can make good
rational 
decisions when they've been awake and
concentrating at their place of 
business for 15 or 17 hours a
day.
 
"Some of the most important 
decisions are made under these
punishing conditions.
 
"Often 
meetings go till midnight or later and often they're
late because they're 
crisis meetings.
 
"So you're supposed to make contributions which 
require
quick thinking and accurate thinking, which is quite 
stupid."
 
Politics demands MPs become salesmen for party policy 
and
fosters "bully personalities", he says.
 
Russell couldn't and 
wouldn't play the game. He'd built a
successful legal career as an 
articulate, charismatic
persuader, but as a politician he came across as dull 
and
humourless.
 
"I withdrew. I lost my sense of humour; I lost 
my voice. I
couldn't even give a good speech as a politician.
 
"I 
was resistant to the skills you have to acquire, which are
skills of making 
yourself seem more important than you
really are and of suppressing other 
people's importance. It
just didn't wash with me."
 
Despite his 
disillusionment with Parliament he maintains he
is "really glad" he had the 
experience.
 
"It's a rare opportunity to have and, being near the 
apex of
power, you do see how people work and you do see what's
wrong back 
on the streets and so I have been pleased to
come back and work at a low 
level at the bar.
 
"I don't take too much work on and I turn away a 
lot more
than I take on. I do a lot of work for free. I do a lot of 
work
where I get paid with some gift, a bottle of wine, some-
times just a 
hug and it's quite rewarding.
 
"It takes me right back to what 
politics is all about - trying to
improve the life of individuals; not trying 
to strengthen the
position of people with power.
 
"In all the 
debate over the Auckland super city or the debate
beginning 
on Hawke's Bay local body amalgamation, no-
one is saying someone living on 
$30,000 somewhere is
going to measurably better off; the lives of individuals 
don't
come into it."
 
The contrast between the "good honest 
argument" of the
courtroom and vote- blinkered MPs was a huge 
frustration
for him.
 
Russell tried to set up a committee to try 
and get a New
Zealand definition of justice, 
but MPs "weren't interested in
big picture stuff, it was what would garner 
them votes next
week in their electorate".
 
Whereas a barrister 
operates under one rule - you don't
knowingly mislead the court - MPs 
"mislead the public all
the time".
 
"You're effectively a 
salesperson and you're delivering a
version of the facts. Like we'd trot out 
unemployment stats,
trot out this and that.
 
"Working for 
Families is a classic. That was a key plank of
the Labour Party, a very good 
part. But it took the Child
Poverty Action Group to take a case to the Human 
Rights
Commission to prove that it was in fact 
discriminatory.
 
 "Because if you were a child of a family on a 
benefit you
didn't get the largesse that Working for Families offered 
the
child of a parent earning the same money who was in
employment. The 
theory being, of course, to get people off
the benefit into employment but 
you couldn't go out and say
this policy is disenfranchising kids of 
beneficiaries because
that wasn't politically correct. You had to say Working 
for
Families is the best thing since sliced bread.
 
"You sell 
them. It's policy rather than principle.
 
"Most backbench MPs could 
not put hand on heart and say
they've done a productive day's work and many 
cabinet
ministers couldn't do that either, because the work's done by
five 
or six people.
 
"The normal currency on the street is money, you 
work for a
dollar. In politics the currency is power and power comes
from 
information so that - you see this happening in the
National Party, it's not 
just a Labour Party thing - the few
people who run the country - there's 
about five - they have
the information and they don't share it, they feed it 
out to
you. It's like when you sell an insurance policy - this is 
the
policy you're going to sell. You don't have planning sessions
you have 
sales sessions in politics.
 
"John Key - and I'm not being party 
political, it was no
different with us - with the Maori seats and smacking 
bill, he
didn't say 'I'll take it to my caucus', he says, 'I've got 
some
ideas, I'll take it to Cabinet on Monday' and then he
announced what 
the outcome was.
 
"His caucus meets on Tuesday so the majority of 
his MPs
had no idea what Cabi- net endorsed of his idea until they
read 
the paper on Tuesday morning."
 
Russell says his recent suggestion 
that the number of MPs
should be reduced from 121 to 60 or 70 was made 
seriously.
 
Some MPs leave Parliament each week having 
"done
nothing for three days, glad to get home and play 
golf".
 
"MPs from some of the minor parties, they have nothing 
to
do, they don't know what their idiosyncratic leaders are
doing until 
they hear them stand up and say something and
you saw that the way the 
Alliance broke 
up," he says.
 
"With modern technology you don't need to be face to 
face.
You don't need 121 MPs.
 
We used to have 90 MPs with 
electorates of 15,000 people
and I think that was too many. I think we could 
get by with
60 or 70 MPs. It would save the country a lot of 
money.
 
Russell says he is far healthier now he is out of 
politics.
 
"I don't snore like I used to, my health's better and 
my
judgement's far better. I have time to let my head work
through issues 
and think about things."