Today Sebastian Riedel wrote:
> You may already be aware that we have rather high quality
> standards in Mojolicious when it comes to unit tests, sadly
> Mojo::Server::FastCGI does not currently live up to those and is
> facing removal from the core distribution.
>
> From what i personally gathered during the last few months,
> FastCGI is losing popularity rather quickly, and the few
> remaining users might be just as happy using the PSGI/Plack
> binding.
Over the past few months, we have been moving all our major
customer projects to using Mojolicious, deploying all of them with
mod_fcgid and mod_suexec on apache ... it has been working
wonderfully ... I would be very sad to see this ability getting
removed from stock Mojolicious ...
For stability and security reasons mod_perl (same as mod_php) is
not an option for us, so without fastcgi we would have to move to
using mod_proxy which is doable but seems more cumbersum than
fastcgi in its requirement to startup a separate server
explicititly ...
Could the lack of FastCGI 'noise' on the ML also come from the fact
that since the introduction of mod_fcgid this combo just works very
well and gives little to discuss?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://it.oetiker.ch to...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900
Over the past few months, we have been moving all our major
customer projects to using Mojolicious, deploying all of them with
mod_fcgid and mod_suexec on apache ... it has been working
wonderfully ... I would be very sad to see this ability getting
removed from stock Mojolicious ...
Could the lack of FastCGI 'noise' on the ML also come from the fact
that since the introduction of mod_fcgid this combo just works very
well and gives little to discuss?
2011/9/12 sri <kra...@googlemail.com>:
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group.
> To post to this group, send email to mojol...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mojolicious...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious?hl=en.
>
>
what's the address of address of repository?
And name in CPAN?
Is there no chance for a return into the core after the separation -
if tests are working?