|
|
modelearth |
i think a global discussion on what would work in the world (as On Feb 4, 9:05 am, "hearthstone" <modelea...@gmail.com> wrote: > Current forms of government are not capable of dealing adequately with > Submitted to BBC -http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/2804227.stm
opposed to just talking about what DOESN'T work) is a good start to
realizing positive change in the world. i understand you to be saying
that software should be either identified or developed to harness
different ideas and give them a field to be tested out in theory
before direct application to the material world (do i have that
right?)... so does the computer software have to come before different
ideas can be gathered, compared and implemented? what can be done
toward this idea in the meantime before such software is found?
> Solving the Global Warming Issue.
> any global challenges, be those global warming, terrorism, or what
> ever global issues.
> What is needed is to start consciously designing the future of the
> world with the participation of all those who are to share this
> future. It is obvious to many that this world needs to change for
> something fundamentally better, but there is a very little consensus
> of what the "better" ought to be in regards to many issues.
> There is a need for a mechanism that would expediently address global
> issues of any kind, and that would come up with solutions that would
> be defendable and justifiable on any grounds, and acceptable by all.
> This could be achieved by modeling what the ideal state of the Earth
> should be--including ideas about sustainability and stabilization of
> the environment--with the participation of anyone who cares for non-
> violent solutions of any global problems. In fact, it would not matter
> who would be inputting the ideas about a better world future into the
> model; what would matter would be how viable and how realistically
> realizable those ideas would be. Anyone not satisfied with the future
> thus modeled would always be welcomed to input the model with better
> ideas.
> To have a well defendable model of what the ideal state of the Earth
> should be would be a good start to improving of all problematical
> global issues. After all--there cannot be a better future for us,
> unless we all agree what such a "better future" should look like!
> The technology for starting of such a dynamically evolving model is
> available in the form of "open source" software, and this model could
> reside on the Internet by using "distributed computing" that would use
> any and all PC's that there are in the world--thus not requiring any
> physical location and a minimal outlay of money.
> Better to resolve differences in a model non-violently than resolving
> differences in real life on battlefields!
> Thank you. sincerely -
> Mr. Jan Hearthstone.
> at 15:00 GMT today.