<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>mod_cache Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache</link>
  <description>Mod-Cache is a cache(reverse-proxy) plugin for lighttpd, which works like Squid with similar configuration. However mod_cache is faster and more effective than Squid because it based on powerful Lighttpd.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mod_cache doesn&#39;t cash?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/a60e43a976d18c6a?show_docid=a60e43a976d18c6a</link>
  <description>
  Thank you. Now it&#39;s clear. &lt;br&gt; But why should I check it everytime? If it is only 10 mins after &lt;br&gt; adding file to cache? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hongyu:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/a60e43a976d18c6a?show_docid=a60e43a976d18c6a</guid>
  <author>
  ren...@renton.name
  (Alesha Vlasov)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:57:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mod_cache doesn&#39;t cash?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/3bbf60a81e21105c?show_docid=3bbf60a81e21105c</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s the difference between mod_cache with other cache servers(such as &lt;br&gt; squid). mod_cache doesn&#39;t provide final request handle for http, it depends &lt;br&gt; on other modules such as mod_proxy and mod_staticfile. &lt;br&gt; When modcache wants to check whether content is expired, it passes request &lt;br&gt; to mod_proxy and parses response of mod_proxy to update local cache file.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/3bbf60a81e21105c?show_docid=3bbf60a81e21105c</guid>
  <author>
  shellc...@gmail.com
  (Hongyu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:53:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mod_cache doesn&#39;t cash?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/921577bb866ec06d?show_docid=921577bb866ec06d</link>
  <description>
  Hongyu: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;It is already set at 10 mins in my config. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I didn&#39;t understand, if I want to check whether the file in cache has &lt;br&gt; expired or not I should make GET request to backend?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/921577bb866ec06d?show_docid=921577bb866ec06d</guid>
  <author>
  ren...@renton.name
  (Alesha Vlasov)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:48:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: mod_cache doesn&#39;t cash?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/ea1b5d6a8b213dda?show_docid=ea1b5d6a8b213dda</link>
  <description>
  this line of cache.refresh-pattern &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;\.(?i)(jpg|bmp|jpeg|gif|png)$ &amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;10&amp;quot;, # 5 munutes &lt;br&gt; set jpg/bmp/jpeg cache for only 10 minutes, so lighttpd has to check backend &lt;br&gt; server whether it&#39;s expired.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/ea1b5d6a8b213dda?show_docid=ea1b5d6a8b213dda</guid>
  <author>
  shellc...@gmail.com
  (Hongyu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:16:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>mod_cache doesn&#39;t cash?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/cba5ef8c96e6f1ae?show_docid=cba5ef8c96e6f1ae</link>
  <description>
  Hi. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I use lighttpd 1.4.19 and mod_cache 1.6.0. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;My settings: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;server.port = 81 &lt;br&gt; server.modules = ( &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;mod_status&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;mod_proxy&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;mod_accesslog&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;mod_cache&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; ) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;cache.debug = &amp;quot;enable&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; cache.bases = (&amp;quot;/tmp/.lighttpd&amp;quot;) &lt;br&gt; cache.support-queries = &amp;quot;enable&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; cache.refresh-pattern = (
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/17c0a94c9eca9de3/cba5ef8c96e6f1ae?show_docid=cba5ef8c96e6f1ae</guid>
  <author>
  ren...@renton.name
  (Alesha Vlasov)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:49:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: HELP: cache repopulation under heavy load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/1a05c7bd4c3364c4/538c501d960600d1?show_docid=538c501d960600d1</link>
  <description>
  Modcache keeps list of urls which are handled to avoid serveral &lt;br&gt; connections writing to one cache file at the same time. That&#39;s the reason of &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;somebody is handling /root/taxes/lighty/cache/ &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.electiontaxes.com/jscomments.php&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; now^M&amp;quot; in lighttpd error logfile
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/1a05c7bd4c3364c4/538c501d960600d1?show_docid=538c501d960600d1</guid>
  <author>
  shellc...@gmail.com
  (Hongyu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:11:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>HELP: cache repopulation under heavy load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/1a05c7bd4c3364c4/561163c91cfbd9f5?show_docid=561163c91cfbd9f5</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m running a site that was recently slammed - 180,000 unique visitors &lt;br&gt; yesterday. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Lighty + mod_cache saved my pants! So thank you to everyone involved. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;My setup is to have lighty in &amp;quot;front&amp;quot; of an apache based php site &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve noticed some behavior that stresses the system when a cached file
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/1a05c7bd4c3364c4/561163c91cfbd9f5?show_docid=561163c91cfbd9f5</guid>
  <author>
  yarrumre...@gmail.com
  (Pete)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:06:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: patch for lighttpd 1.5.0 r2294 is available now</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/908d07b3603066fa/5470b8c7dc135d00?show_docid=5470b8c7dc135d00</link>
  <description>
  THX :P
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/908d07b3603066fa/5470b8c7dc135d00?show_docid=5470b8c7dc135d00</guid>
  <author>
  snail...@gmail.com
  (Snailfly. Yin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:38:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: modcache 1.6.0 released</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/1040004973935429?show_docid=1040004973935429</link>
  <description>
  1) You can use mod_mem_cache with mod_cache. &lt;br&gt; 2) one metadata cache takes less than 512 bytes, 1M file metacache takes &lt;br&gt; less than 512M memory &lt;br&gt; 2008/9/13 MaximeCD &amp;lt;Maxim...@gmail.com&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/1040004973935429?show_docid=1040004973935429</guid>
  <author>
  shellc...@gmail.com
  (Hongyu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:28:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Handling Vary: ?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/904d66245fa0e977/0cccaed4d01fd558?show_docid=0cccaed4d01fd558</link>
  <description>
  Ok, it&#39;s stupid now that I know ModCache better :) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Contrary to squid, lighttpd can gzip files. So it&#39;s better to disable &lt;br&gt; gzip on backend servers, let ModCache store an uncompressed file, and &lt;br&gt; then let mod_compress compress the file + store a compressed copy. &lt;br&gt; Even better mod_compress can do bzip2 for Google Chromium.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/904d66245fa0e977/0cccaed4d01fd558?show_docid=0cccaed4d01fd558</guid>
  <author>
  maxim...@gmail.com
  (MaximeCD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:52:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: modcache 1.6.0 released</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/b70a440c95ecc3fc?show_docid=b70a440c95ecc3fc</link>
  <description>
  The answer is very simple, you just have to run a test server to see &lt;br&gt; it : the metadatas are stored on disk. But I discover that they are &lt;br&gt; also stored in memory. Does it mean that lighttpd memory consumption &lt;br&gt; will continue to grow with time and new files ? Or is there a limit of &lt;br&gt; metadata stored in memory ? (like mod_mem_cache has).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/b70a440c95ecc3fc?show_docid=b70a440c95ecc3fc</guid>
  <author>
  maxim...@gmail.com
  (MaximeCD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:46:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>patch for lighttpd 1.5.0 r2294 is available now</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/908d07b3603066fa/601cd20ef6595148?show_docid=601cd20ef6595148</link>
  <description>
  patch is &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2294.modcache.v.1.6.1.patch&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;patched tarball is &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2294.modcache.v.1.6.1.tar.gz&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;please enjoy it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/908d07b3603066fa/601cd20ef6595148?show_docid=601cd20ef6595148</guid>
  <author>
  shellc...@gmail.com
  (qhy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:41:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>does mod_cache handle client request?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/c5d6dad29c15b26c/001fda385951ab2f?show_docid=001fda385951ab2f</link>
  <description>
  hi all, &lt;br&gt; I am a newbie. &lt;br&gt; Can someone discribe the request data flow works.if use a backend &lt;br&gt; sever, proxy server using the mod_cache. &lt;br&gt; I can&#39;t find where read the cache file in the mod-cache&#39;s code, just &lt;br&gt; can find update header cache and cache file. &lt;br&gt; can someone tell me how it works.though I have read the page of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/c5d6dad29c15b26c/001fda385951ab2f?show_docid=001fda385951ab2f</guid>
  <author>
  nkcheun...@gmail.com
  (fishman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:43:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Cache directory disk space growth</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/b6c18b80785d1255/3856bde6f12e0468?show_docid=3856bde6f12e0468</link>
  <description>
  endless..., it seemed i asked the same question yesterday. &lt;br&gt; can you tell me the difference among &#39;memcache&#39;(header cache list), &lt;br&gt; &#39;cache_save&#39;(splay_tree) and &#39;range_request&#39;(splay_tree), i read the &lt;br&gt; code, but can&#39;t understand the three datastructures. &lt;br&gt; thank you very much.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/b6c18b80785d1255/3856bde6f12e0468?show_docid=3856bde6f12e0468</guid>
  <author>
  nkcheun...@gmail.com
  (fishman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:34:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: modcache 1.6.0 released</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/9a4c3a941b2d4869?show_docid=9a4c3a941b2d4869</link>
  <description>
  key = hash&amp;amp;(MEM_CACHE_NUM-1); &lt;br&gt; c = memcache+key; &lt;br&gt; you use 2^17 as mem-cache-num, is there any conflict of the key?the &lt;br&gt; update step may delete the useful header cache whose key is the same &lt;br&gt; as the newer, will it happen? &lt;br&gt; reboot the system, won&#39;t it re-init the memcache? and, the cache files &lt;br&gt; imformation won&#39;t lose?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mod_cache/browse_thread/thread/cf45470561c60031/9a4c3a941b2d4869?show_docid=9a4c3a941b2d4869</guid>
  <author>
  nkcheun...@gmail.com
  (张宇)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:28:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
