Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  11 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Laur  
View profile  
 More options Jul 7, 1:24 pm
From: John Laur <johnl...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 7 2009 1:24 pm
Subject: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
Is any update available on the status of mod_cache with lighttpd
1.5.0? The latest snapshot release from the lighttpd developers is
r2533 but it looks like any downloads for the 1.5 branch have been
removed from the mod_cache page. Is there another patch or files
floating around somewhere that I can have a go at making work with
r2533?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options Jul 7, 9:06 pm
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:06:13 +0800
Local: Tues, Jul 7 2009 9:06 pm
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533

there has no modcache update for lighttpd 1.5.0 release. It's hard to know
which revision is stable for production usage.
anyone can tell me which 1.5.0 revision is stable enough? and I will try to
update patch for lighttpd 1.5.0


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Laur  
View profile  
 More options Jul 8, 7:28 pm
From: John Laur <johnl...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jul 8 2009 7:28 pm
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
On Jul 7, 8:06 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> there has no modcache update for lighttpd 1.5.0 release. It's hard to know
> which revision is stable for production usage.
> anyone can tell me which 1.5.0 revision is stable enough? and I will try to
> update patch for lighttpd 1.5.0

Thanks for your response. I have had good luck with any of the
revision numbers the lighttpd team releases explicitly as a snapshot.
1.5.0~r2533 was announced and released about a month ago
http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2009/06/11/pre-release-lighttpd-1-4....
Most importantly, earlier versions can be remotely segfaulted on SSL.
This is the 1.5.0 release that is currently going to get the most use,
I think.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options Jul 8, 8:14 pm
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:14:59 +0800
Local: Wed, Jul 8 2009 8:14 pm
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533

you can download the patched source tar ball at
http://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2533.modcache.v.1.8....
.
only mod_cache 1.8.0 is inclued


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Laur  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9, 12:00 pm
From: John Laur <johnl...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 9 2009 12:00 pm
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
Thank you very much for your work developing this module. It has been
very useful to us.

On Jul 8, 7:14 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Laur  
View profile  
 More options Aug 2, 6:17 pm
From: John Laur <johnl...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Aug 2 2009 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533

On Jul 8, 7:14 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> you can download the patched source tar ball athttp://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2533.modcache.v.1.8....
> .
> only mod_cache 1.8.0 is inclued

I have been wrestling with this for a while -- it seems something is
very broken with this patch. HTTP backends using chunked encoding seem
to have their content mangled badly even if this content from the
backends is not cached and mod_cache is not loaded. I'm sorry that I
do not understand lighttpd internals well enough yet to give a better
report.

Regards,
John


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mahyuddin  
View profile  
 More options Aug 11, 7:01 am
From: Mahyuddin <mahyuddin.husa...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Aug 11 2009 7:01 am
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
How about if we have patch file of mod_cache 1.8.0 for lighttpd 1.5
because thats what im doing everytime i update my lighttpd 1.5 but
recently i just only can use mod_cache 1.6. In the mean time version
1.5 still not in stable status, i guess patch file is more practical
even during patch process there's some error and i have to put codes
from the patch file manually into latest lighttpd 1.5 source code
revision.

I believe most of the users really want to use latest mod_cache with
their lighttpd 1.5 including me.

On Aug 3, 6:17 am, John  Laur <johnl...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options Aug 11, 7:14 am
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:14:08 +0800
Local: Tues, Aug 11 2009 7:14 am
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mahyuddin  
View profile  
 More options Aug 12, 5:17 am
From: Mahyuddin <mahyuddin.husa...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 12 2009 5:17 am
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
Got this error message when im using fullversion(mod_cache1.8 +
lighttpd 1.5) or using patch

2009-08-12 16:57:57 (error) (mod_proxy_backend_ajp13.c:305) we have 41
bytes, but a partial-string wants 40. no way
2009-08-12 16:57:57 (error) (mod_proxy_backend_ajp13.c:333) parsing
AJP13 response-reason failed: ...
2009-08-12 16:57:57 (error) (mod_proxy_backend_ajp13.c:628) Error
parsing response_headers
2009-08-12 16:57:57 (error) (mod_proxy_core.c:860) stream decoder
failed.
2009-08-12 16:57:57 (trace) (mod_proxy_core.c:2431) state: 4 (error)
2009-08-12 16:57:57 (trace) (connections.c:1363) filter[5] is not
empty: 5 (report me)

My scenario is, im using lighty as a webtier for my high traffic
liferay portal + tomcat. That's why im using mod_proxy_backend_ajp13.
Currently in production i just simply using lighttpd 1.5 with
mod_cache 1.6. Both combination is my savior but i still want to get
the advantage of new features in mod_cache 1.8 for my lighttpd 1.5.
Seems like current implementation got some problem when im using ajp
protocol for my mod_proxy_core. Any idea?

On Aug 11, 7:14 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options Aug 12, 5:46 am
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:46:42 +0800
Local: Wed, Aug 12 2009 5:46 am
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533

the reason may be uninitialized buffer->ref_count variable during
buffer_init()

I update patch file and tarball, you can try it.

tarball:
http://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2533.modcache.v.1.8....

patch:
http://www.linux.com.cn/modcache/lighttpd-1.5.0.r2533.modcache.v.1.8....


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mahyuddin  
View profile  
 More options Aug 17, 3:46 am
From: Mahyuddin <mahyuddin.husa...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Aug 17 2009 3:46 am
Subject: Re: lighttpd-1.5.0~r2533
It working, thanks a lot. Will try that patch into latest lighttpd
revision.

On Aug 12, 5:46 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google