Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
mod_cache
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
edvin  
View profile  
 More options May 5 2009, 8:48 pm
From: edvin <edv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 17:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 5 2009 8:48 pm
Subject: mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
According to http://blog.quehy.com/archives/208.html, mod_cache now
has support for memory based storage. Does this mean that it is an
effective replacement for mod_mem_cache? I'd like to move to something
stable for Lighty 1.4.22.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options May 5 2009, 9:14 pm
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:14:23 +0800
Local: Tues, May 5 2009 9:14 pm
Subject: Re: mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

yeah. modcache with memory storage is very powerful, which is beyond my
expectation.
modcache can save compress content in memory too.
The only drawback is you lost all memory cache when lighttpd is restarted.

to be simple:
   modcache 1.7 = modcache 1.6 + mod_mem_cache + mod_mem_compress


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
edvin  
View profile  
 More options May 5 2009, 9:39 pm
From: edvin <edv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 5 2009 9:39 pm
Subject: Re: mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
shellcode,

Thanks for the clarification.

On May 5, 6:14 pm, shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
steven  
View profile  
 More options May 6 2009, 9:54 pm
From: steven <steven110.zh...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 6 2009 9:54 pm
Subject: Re: mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I have a question about mod_cache support momory based storage.When
the object in memeory cache expires,the obeject is rmoved to local
disk or pass to backend ?

On 5月6日, 上午8时48分, edvin <edv...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
shellcode  
View profile  
 More options May 6 2009, 10:46 pm
From: shellcode <shellc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:46:21 +0800
Local: Wed, May 6 2009 10:46 pm
Subject: Re: mod_cache 1.7.0 vs. mod_mem_cache
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

expired objects will be removed from memory and requests are passed to
backend servers, then objects get updated and expire time is extended

2009/5/7 steven <steven110.zh...@gmail.com>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google