<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Google Mockups Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups</link>
  <description>Google User Interface mockups by Joe Critchley. A place to see the latest draft designs and final results. Feel free to pose questions and criticisms about the designs.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Really annoying feature in current UI</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/7085946e2b7b0272/4275a199fc4a81d4?show_docid=4275a199fc4a81d4</link>
  <description>
  Slightly off topic I&#39;m afraid, can anyone point me to where I can &lt;br&gt; comment effectively on the really annoying habit of the current UI of &lt;br&gt; reverting searches to the most recent similar search. &lt;br&gt; I often slightly modify a search, add in a term, delete one, put in &amp;quot;&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; or +. Recently my searches using firefox have taken to reverting to the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/7085946e2b7b0272/4275a199fc4a81d4?show_docid=4275a199fc4a81d4</guid>
  <author>
  midgley....@googlemail.com
  (TomMidgley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:14:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Discussion on search-efficiency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/0029e9e20553ca8d?show_docid=0029e9e20553ca8d</link>
  <description>
  yeaj, there should only be limited buttons.. not more then 4 ..with a &lt;br&gt; button for all :)-
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/0029e9e20553ca8d?show_docid=0029e9e20553ca8d</guid>
  <author>
  slash...@gmail.com
  (Peter Dawson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:31:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Discussion on search-efficiency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/b7e920dea726927d?show_docid=b7e920dea726927d</link>
  <description>
  I think I like the idea of radio buttons, as long as there aren&#39;t too &lt;br&gt; many, because then it would look cluttered.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/b7e920dea726927d?show_docid=b7e920dea726927d</guid>
  <author>
  joecri...@gmail.com
  (Mambo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:32:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Discussion on search-efficiency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/da49087dc52929c2?show_docid=da49087dc52929c2</link>
  <description>
  I think that ; &lt;br&gt; (a)&amp;quot;type of search&amp;quot; is important, why dont you have radio buttons or check box..this means results can be pulled from one service or a host of services, or something like that.. &lt;br&gt; (b) At each desgin iteration of the screen, one also needs to do click analysis from a UX view point. As a user I just want to type in my search term and hit enter. Two actions. But with other varations the users is now forced to move to multiple clicks or keystrokes to active any results.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/6b8071c8367c3a30/da49087dc52929c2?show_docid=da49087dc52929c2</guid>
  <author>
  slash...@gmail.com
  (Peter Dawson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:54:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>WOW</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/154ae1ca151da9c9/f594c6a76b4c3d86?show_docid=f594c6a76b4c3d86</link>
  <description>
  SO COOL!!!! &lt;br&gt; i really liked this logo: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups-beta.google.com/group/mockups/icon?v=1&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; im telling ya man, you gotta show your stuff to Google!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/154ae1ca151da9c9/f594c6a76b4c3d86?show_docid=f594c6a76b4c3d86</guid>
  <author>
  orphandl...@gmail.com
  (David Hetfield)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:26:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/73b7e29e52f545de/276fc6e85d45a4b0?show_docid=276fc6e85d45a4b0</link>
  <description>
  another test posting for good measure.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/73b7e29e52f545de/276fc6e85d45a4b0?show_docid=276fc6e85d45a4b0</guid>
  <author>
  joecri...@gmail.com
  (Mambo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:38:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/73b7e29e52f545de/ad1936a6b6588cf6?show_docid=ad1936a6b6588cf6</link>
  <description>
  testing posting
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/mockups/browse_thread/thread/73b7e29e52f545de/ad1936a6b6588cf6?show_docid=ad1936a6b6588cf6</guid>
  <author>
  slash...@gmail.com
  (Peter Dawson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:42:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
