Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
"search-efficiency" - Discussion
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
This discussion is about page search-efficiency
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
search-efficiency was created by Mambo
Peter Dawson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 24 2006, 5:54 pm
From: Peter Dawson <slash...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:54:43 +0000
Local: Tues, Oct 24 2006 5:54 pm
Subject: Discussion on search-efficiency
I think that ;

(a)"type of search" is important, why dont you have radio buttons or check box..this means results can be pulled from one service or a host of services, or something like that..

(b) At each desgin iteration of the screen, one also needs to do click analysis from a UX view point. As a user I just want to type in my search term and hit enter. Two actions. But with other varations the users is now forced to move to multiple clicks or keystrokes to active any results.

(c) Once we have an SERP, we should have a link under each return results that also has a translate this button , just how we have the current note button


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mambo  
View profile  
 More options Oct 25 2006, 1:32 pm
From: "Mambo" <joecri...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:32:37 -0000
Local: Wed, Oct 25 2006 1:32 pm
Subject: Re: Discussion on search-efficiency
I think I like the idea of radio buttons, as long as there aren't too
many, because then it would look cluttered.

On Oct 24, 10:54 pm, Peter Dawson <slash...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Peter Dawson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 25 2006, 3:31 pm
From: "Peter Dawson" <slash...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:31:10 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 25 2006 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: Discussion on search-efficiency
yeaj, there should only be limited buttons.. not more then 4 ..with a
button for all :)-

On Oct 25, 1:32 pm, "Mambo" <joecri...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google