mockito-flex Google Group

Re: [mockito-flex] Re: Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:08:26 UT

OK :) let me get you through some basics.
Why do you need mocking? You want to test A but it's hard since it depends
on B which depends on C etc. What do you do? You mock B. B is your
dependency while A is your system under test.
Using mockito you want to do what is needed by the test of A and *then* make

Re: Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

clemr...@gmail.com (Eric H) — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:11:30 UT

Sorry for the long reply. I guess one thing that I'm not getting is
what you mean by system under test. In this case, I am assuming the
ScaleService but I wanted to clarify that.

Also, I tried your suggestion and the test works fine:

[Test(async)]
public function mockitoGetScaleData1():void

Re: [mockito-flex] Re: Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:48:59 UT

Once again, what you show in your test is hard to follow.
With mockito you work this way:
1) setup mock *dependencies* for your* system under test* (I can't see any
system under test in your code, I can see a bunch of mocked dependencies
though)
2) if it's needed setup stubs (given()....)
3) call *system under test* (again in your code I can only see calling the

Re: Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

clemr...@gmail.com (Eric H) — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:12:44 UT

Just as a quick test, I ran this:

[code]
[Test(async)]
public function mockitoGetScaleData1():void
{
var token:AsyncToken =
mockScaleService.getScaleData( faultHandler);
given(mockScaleService.getScal eData).willReturn(token);
verify().that(mockScaleService .getScaleData(faultHandler));

Re: [mockito-flex] Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:31:42 UT

I think the main reason is that you instantiate mockito on your own. I'm
not sure where did you find it however that's not the right way.
MockitoRule creates Mockito instance in a global context and later on
global functions expose mockito functionality for you.
1) Remove your manual instancing of Mockito

Mockito problems - Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given Options

clemr...@gmail.com (Eric H) — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:42:06 UT

Hello,
I'm trying to get a handle on mocking w/ Mockito to and I keeping
getting this error:
"Please make sure you specified a call to stub in given". Also, I
cannot get mockito to work unless I add the mock directive
outside the class:
[code]
[Mock(type="common.services.Sc aleService")]

Vs: Re: [mockito-flex] "TestCase could not be found" When running tests with maven

aapae...@gmail.com (-Erno) — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:38:44 UT

Hi, thanks for reply!
I attach the sample project.
I have mockito-flex swc in local nexus so you maybe have to edit systemPath
at bottom of pom.xml.
And I use Maven 3.0.3.
Thanks for helping! Really appreciate!

Re: [mockito-flex] "TestCase could not be found" When running tests with maven

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:11:33 UT

Hi,
Strange indeed.
Do you mind sending a sample project (pom.xml, some example test,
dependencies)?
Regards,
Kris

"TestCase could not be found" When running tests with maven

aapae...@gmail.com (-Erno) — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:35:19 UT

Hi!
Thanks for your great framework.

I'm trying to run tests with maven but if I use 1.4M4 or 1.4M5 I get
this error when testrunner starts:

VerifyError: Error #1014: Class asunit.framework::TestCase could not
be found.

at flash.display::MovieClip/nextF rame()
at mx.managers::SystemManager/def erredNextFrame()[E:\dev

Potential bug on asFunctionAndCall()

elian.hali...@gmail.com (papayavsbanana) — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:30:14 UT

We are using mockito-1.4M3 and FlexUnit4.

We are testing a class and mock the service in it. We are unable to
pass parameter to a function called by mock object. This is what the
code is like (with non-important code stripped out):

public class Controller {
private var service:RemoteService;

Re: [mockito-flex] Potential bug on asFunctionAndCall()

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:08:01 UT

I'll take a look. Might be a bug.
Regards,
Kris

Re: [mockito-flex] Potential bug on asFunctionAndCall()

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:08:29 UT

I'll take a look. Might be a bug.
Regards,
Kris

Re: Mocked ArrayCollection throws ReferenceError

mattjpo...@gmail.com (mjp) — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:19:07 UT

Hi Kris,

Thanks for the response. I'm not sure how the issue with application
domain is related here

The interesting thing is that with the flexunit3 integration I could
mock ArrayCollection and I can mock an ArrayList with the flexunit4
integration. I just cant seem to mock ArrayCollection with flexunit4.

Re: [mockito-flex] Verify assignments to public variables

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:20:37 UT

True - this would work but at this point I have no plans in doing so. You
can simply mark your property as bindable to achieve the same.
Regards,
Kris

Re: [mockito-flex] Mocked ArrayCollection throws ReferenceError

kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com (Kris) — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:17:21 UT

You may want to take a look at this issue:
[link]
Regards,
Kris