Groups
Sign in
Groups
mockito-dev
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
mockito-dev
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 2833
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
tvanderlippe
, …
Rafael Winterhalter
3
9/18/18
Future of mockito-android
Hi, for my part, this is the best way to go forward. mockito-android was added in a period where the
unread,
Future of mockito-android
Hi, for my part, this is the best way to go forward. mockito-android was added in a period where the
9/18/18
Szczepan Faber
, …
Sergii Kabashniuk
5
8/7/18
Re: Official support TestNG with mockito-testng artifact
> Can it be released on Maven Central as well? Yes, I'm planning to do that. Wanted to hear if
unread,
Re: Official support TestNG with mockito-testng artifact
> Can it be released on Maven Central as well? Yes, I'm planning to do that. Wanted to hear if
8/7/18
Eyal Roth
7/25/18
Tests fail on "release/2.x" branch
I tried running the tests of the current release/2.x branch (commit
unread,
Tests fail on "release/2.x" branch
I tried running the tests of the current release/2.x branch (commit
7/25/18
Charles Munger
, …
Tim van der Lippe
5
3/17/18
Want to contribute a bugfix
Feel free to open a PR and we can take a look. On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 04:58 Charles Munger, <
unread,
Want to contribute a bugfix
Feel free to open a PR and we can take a look. On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 04:58 Charles Munger, <
3/17/18
Szczepan Faber
2
4/9/17
Mockito Travis build issue - ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed
Hey Buck! We stopped building on Java6 to resolve the issue :) Let's move on. The time spent on
unread,
Mockito Travis build issue - ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed
Hey Buck! We stopped building on Java6 to resolve the issue :) Let's move on. The time spent on
4/9/17
Tim van der Lippe
,
Rafael Winterhalter
3
11/29/16
Release procedure proposal for multiple artifacts
Glad to hear the Android folks like it! The reason I proposed separate repos for the artifacts is so
unread,
Release procedure proposal for multiple artifacts
Glad to hear the Android folks like it! The reason I proposed separate repos for the artifacts is so
11/29/16
Szczepan Faber
10/16/16
Changed default branch to release/2.x
Hey guys, I changed the default branch to release/2.x in GitHub. It's because more work is
unread,
Changed default branch to release/2.x
Hey guys, I changed the default branch to release/2.x in GitHub. It's because more work is
10/16/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Brice Dutheil
12
10/11/16
2 concurrent dev branches
Adding features to release/2.x and constantly merging them to master is an extra effort but let me
unread,
2 concurrent dev branches
Adding features to release/2.x and constantly merging them to master is an extra effort but let me
10/11/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Tim van der Lippe
4
10/9/16
stop merging to release/2.x until #681 is fixed
Irrelevant now as PR is ready :) https://github.com/mockito/mockito/pull/683 Cheers! On Sun, Oct 9,
unread,
stop merging to release/2.x until #681 is fixed
Irrelevant now as PR is ready :) https://github.com/mockito/mockito/pull/683 Cheers! On Sun, Oct 9,
10/9/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Rafael Winterhalter
5
9/16/16
on a break
You are right, I will make sure to mention it! 2016-09-15 18:23 GMT+02:00 Szczepan Faber <szczepiq
unread,
on a break
You are right, I will make sure to mention it! 2016-09-15 18:23 GMT+02:00 Szczepan Faber <szczepiq
9/16/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Tim van der Lippe
4
9/10/16
issue with release/test branch?
I tried to check out but it appears that this branch has since been removed: https://github.com/
unread,
issue with release/test branch?
I tried to check out but it appears that this branch has since been removed: https://github.com/
9/10/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Brice Dutheil
3
9/8/16
kill 'news' wiki
Sure -- Brice On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Tim van der Lippe <tvande...@gmail.com> wrote:
unread,
kill 'news' wiki
Sure -- Brice On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Tim van der Lippe <tvande...@gmail.com> wrote:
9/8/16
tvanderlippe
9/3/16
Mockito credentials
Hey all, Since Szczepan is stepping down after 2.0 is released, we need to figure how to safely
unread,
Mockito credentials
Hey all, Since Szczepan is stepping down after 2.0 is released, we need to figure how to safely
9/3/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Marcin Grzejszczak
10
8/24/16
squashing PRs
My 2 cents... I'd personally squash the commits (we do that in Spring Cloud and it works like a
unread,
squashing PRs
My 2 cents... I'd personally squash the commits (we do that in Spring Cloud and it works like a
8/24/16
Szczepan Faber
,
Tim van der Lippe
4
8/21/16
verifyNoMoreInteractions to ignore realized stubbings by default
I couldn't come up with the use case that convinces me. Let's move on and maybe revisit :) On
unread,
verifyNoMoreInteractions to ignore realized stubbings by default
I couldn't come up with the use case that convinces me. Let's move on and maybe revisit :) On
8/21/16
tvanderlippe
, …
Szczepan Faber
14
8/21/16
Timeline Mockito 2.0 and 3.0
Just saw this message :) >Do have an idea if you want to break the public API between a 2.0 and a
unread,
Timeline Mockito 2.0 and 3.0
Just saw this message :) >Do have an idea if you want to break the public API between a 2.0 and a
8/21/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Tim van der Lippe
5
8/2/16
Twitter handle
It's awesome, thanks!!!! On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 19:11 Tim van der Lippe <tvanderlippe@gmail.
unread,
Twitter handle
It's awesome, thanks!!!! On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 19:11 Tim van der Lippe <tvanderlippe@gmail.
8/2/16
Szczepan Faber
, …
Brice Dutheil
5
7/27/16
mockito lint
Your point is valid but is beyond mockito. If there's 8 mocks, maybe someone has a good reason
unread,
mockito lint
Your point is valid but is beyond mockito. If there's 8 mocks, maybe someone has a good reason
7/27/16
Szczepan Faber
2
7/23/16
[Mockito 2.0] Call for vote! anyT() matchers behavior
Also: please be open-minded (I promise I will be, too), let's pick option that is best for our
unread,
[Mockito 2.0] Call for vote! anyT() matchers behavior
Also: please be open-minded (I promise I will be, too), let's pick option that is best for our
7/23/16
tvanderlippe
, …
Brice Dutheil
5
6/24/16
Slack or faster communication channel
Invites to Marcin have been sent :tada: Christian are you reading this conversation? If so please
unread,
Slack or faster communication channel
Invites to Marcin have been sent :tada: Christian are you reading this conversation? If so please
6/24/16
Rafael Winterhalter
,
Tim van der Lippe
2
6/19/16
Removal of CustomizedAnnotationForSmartMockTest
Since the only purpose of this mock is an alias of `RETURNS_SMART_NULLS` I would say remove this
unread,
Removal of CustomizedAnnotationForSmartMockTest
Since the only purpose of this mock is an alias of `RETURNS_SMART_NULLS` I would say remove this
6/19/16
Brice Dutheil
, …
Marcin Grzejszczak
10
5/27/16
Team member candidature
Yup, I'm also eager to get answer to this question ;) On May 9, 2016 2:11 PM, "tvanderlippe
unread,
Team member candidature
Yup, I'm also eager to get answer to this question ;) On May 9, 2016 2:11 PM, "tvanderlippe
5/27/16
Marcin Zajączkowski
4/18/16
[ANN] mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta.2 released
Hello guys, I would like to announce (a little late) a release of mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta.2 which
unread,
[ANN] mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta.2 released
Hello guys, I would like to announce (a little late) a release of mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta.2 which
4/18/16
Szczepan Faber
4/16/16
changing version 2.0.x-beta to 2.0.0.beta-x
Hey, OSGi is unhappy with 'hyphen' in the name. Unfortunately, hyphen is required according
unread,
changing version 2.0.x-beta to 2.0.0.beta-x
Hey, OSGi is unhappy with 'hyphen' in the name. Unfortunately, hyphen is required according
4/16/16
Marcin Zajączkowski
,
Szczepan Faber
3
12/1/15
[ANN][java8] mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta - mocking without static imports
On 2015-12-01 08:59, Szczepan Faber wrote: > Cool. Thanks!!! > > Feel free to post to the
unread,
[ANN][java8] mockito-java8 2.0.0-beta - mocking without static imports
On 2015-12-01 08:59, Szczepan Faber wrote: > Cool. Thanks!!! > > Feel free to post to the
12/1/15
Marcin Zajączkowski
,
Szczepan Faber
4
11/26/15
[java8] Entry points to methods from Mockito API via interfaces
Hey, Great stuff!!! >To simplify the things I've just reduced number of public interfaces to 3
unread,
[java8] Entry points to methods from Mockito API via interfaces
Hey, Great stuff!!! >To simplify the things I've just reduced number of public interfaces to 3
11/26/15
Szczepan Faber
10/11/15
richer stubbing API - for devs
Hey devs, I'm thinking about spicing up 2.0 release: https://github.com/mockito/mockito/issues/
unread,
richer stubbing API - for devs
Hey devs, I'm thinking about spicing up 2.0 release: https://github.com/mockito/mockito/issues/
10/11/15
Brice Dutheil
7/27/15
Re: [mockito] New team member ?
Idem, cool. I'll add you on gh and other mailing-lists as well. -- Brice On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at
unread,
Re: [mockito] New team member ?
Idem, cool. I'll add you on gh and other mailing-lists as well. -- Brice On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at
7/27/15
Szczepan Faber
,
Brice Dutheil
7
7/8/15
status of bytebuddy integration
+1 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015, 06:19 Brice Dutheil <brice....@gmail.com> wrote: Do we want to ship
unread,
status of bytebuddy integration
+1 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015, 06:19 Brice Dutheil <brice....@gmail.com> wrote: Do we want to ship
7/8/15
Szczepan Faber
, …
Brice Dutheil
10
7/7/15
bytebuddy plan
> DependenciesDeclarationOverflowDeveloperError :) +1 I want developers to only declare dependency
unread,
bytebuddy plan
> DependenciesDeclarationOverflowDeveloperError :) +1 I want developers to only declare dependency
7/7/15